110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23607553)
1. Comparative performance of contact plates, electrostatic wipes, swabs and a novel sampling device for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces.
Lutz JK; Crawford J; Hoet AE; Wilkins JR; Lee J
J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 115(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 23607553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Methods for Sampling of Staphylococcus aureus and Other Staphylococcus Species from Indoor Surfaces.
Madsen AM; Phan HUT; Laursen M; White JK; Uhrbrand K
Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Nov; 64(9):1020-1034. PubMed ID: 32968799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring.
Goverde M; Willrodt J; Staerk A
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27516491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
Moore G; Griffith C
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of commercially available contact plates for monitoring microbial environments.
Pinto F; Hiom S; Girdlestone S; Maillard JY
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 19187502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Quantitative Sampling Technique for Detection and Monitoring of Clostridium difficile Contamination in the Clinical Environment.
Ali S; Muzslay M; Wilson P
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2570-4. PubMed ID: 26041892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of different methods for the recovery of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from environmental surfaces.
Obee P; Griffith CJ; Cooper RA; Bennion NE
J Hosp Infect; 2007 Jan; 65(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17140698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples.
Estill CF; Baron PA; Beard JK; Hein MJ; Larsen LD; Rose L; Schaefer FW; Noble-Wang J; Hodges L; Lindquist HD; Deye GJ; Arduino MJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 75(13):4297-306. PubMed ID: 19429546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of different methods to recover meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from hospital environmental surfaces.
Dolan A; Bartlett M; McEntee B; Creamer E; Humphreys H
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Nov; 79(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 21742414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of sponge wipe surface sampling for collection of potential surrogates for non-spore-forming bioterrorism agents.
Aslett LD; Calfee MW; Monge M; Abdel-Hady A; Chamberlain T; Baartmans R; Touati A
J Appl Microbiol; 2024 May; 135(5):. PubMed ID: 38609348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3M Petrifilm environmental Listeria plates against standard enrichment methods for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes of epidemiological significance from environmental surfaces.
Nyachuba DG; Donnelly CW
J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):M346-54. PubMed ID: 18034727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface sampling for endotoxin assessment using electrostatic wiping cloths.
Thorne PS; Metwali N; Avol E; McConnell RS
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jul; 49(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 15689394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of a new three-step protocol to determine the efficacy of disinfectant wipes on surfaces contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus.
Williams GJ; Denyer SP; Hosein IK; Hill DW; Maillard JY
J Hosp Infect; 2007 Dec; 67(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 17945392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of thermal cycling on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on stainless steel and titanium orthopaedic plates.
Akens MK; Chien C; Katchky RN; Kreder HJ; Finkelstein J; Whyne CM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jul; 19(1):260. PubMed ID: 30049271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-negative rate, limit of detection and recovery efficiency performance of a validated macrofoam-swab sampling method for low surface concentrations of Bacillus anthracis Sterne and Bacillus atrophaeus spores.
Piepel GF; Deatherage Kaiser BL; Amidan BG; Sydor MA; Barrett CA; Hutchison JR
J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 121(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 26972788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental survivability and surface sampling efficiencies for Pseudomonas aeruginosa on various fomites.
Jones TM; Lutz EA
J Environ Health; 2014 May; 76(9):16-20. PubMed ID: 24909008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a New Environmental Sampling Protocol for Detection of Human Norovirus on Inanimate Surfaces.
Park GW; Lee D; Treffiletti A; Hrsak M; Shugart J; Vinjé J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Sep; 81(17):5987-92. PubMed ID: 26116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of possible disinfectant transfer on Staphylococcus aureus plate counts after agar contact sampling.
Brummer B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 32(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 788638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there an association between airborne and surface microbes in the critical care environment?
Smith J; Adams CE; King MF; Noakes CJ; Robertson C; Dancer SJ
J Hosp Infect; 2018 Nov; 100(3):e123-e129. PubMed ID: 29649556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.
Brown GS; Betty RG; Brockmann JE; Lucero DA; Souza CA; Walsh KS; Boucher RM; Tezak MS; Wilson MC; Rudolph T; Lindquist HD; Martinez KF
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1074-80. PubMed ID: 17897212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
