These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital. Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of Carotid Ultrasonography Combined with Monocyte/HDL Ratio in Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis. Bao MQ; Chen YN; Jin JW; Gui DD; Wang J; Chen SS; Sheng XN; Cheng ZL; Wang Y Curr Med Imaging; 2024; 20():e15734056289735. PubMed ID: 38639287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis. Iizuka K; Takekawa H; Iwasaki A; Igarashi H; Suzuki K; Kobayashi S; Tsukui D; Hirata K J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Apr; 47(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 31912319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading of proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by Doppler/duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA): correlation and interrater reliability in real-life practice. Matz O; Nikoubashman O; Rajkumar P; Keuler A; Wiesmann M; Schulz JB; Reich A Acta Neurol Belg; 2017 Mar; 117(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 27464734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens. Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. Moneta GL; Edwards JM; Chitwood RW; Taylor LM; Lee RW; Cummings CA; Porter JM J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 17(1):152-7; discussion 157-9. PubMed ID: 8421332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Center specific duplex Doppler threshold values in carotid artery stenosis]. Yurdakul M; Tola M; Ozdemir E; Işiksalan Ozbülbül N; Cumhur T Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Jun; 10(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 15236136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography. Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study. Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing internal carotid artery stenosis with a semiautomated computed tomography angiography tool and duplex ultrasound. Müller M; Agten CA; Österreich M; Hoffmann M J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 61(6):1449-56. PubMed ID: 25776187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The measurement of stenosis of the internal carotid artery: comparison of doppler ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography and the 3D CT volume rendering technique. Flis V; Tetickovic E; Breznik S; Stirn B; Matela J; Miksić K Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2004; 116 Suppl 2():51-5. PubMed ID: 15506311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]