These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23608395)
1. Intravascular Imaging for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What Does the Totality of Data Suggest, and Where Should We Go? Maehara A; Sugizaki Y Circulation; 2024 Apr; 149(14):1087-1089. PubMed ID: 38557127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenge of Measuring Outcomes For Intravascular Imaging During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Administrative Database. Elkaryoni A; Saad M; Abbott JD Am J Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 212():143. PubMed ID: 38042268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronary heart disease incidence and competing risks: an important issue. Puddu PE; Amaduzzi PL; Ricci B J Geriatr Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 14(7):425-429. PubMed ID: 28868070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is vasospasm overestimated in acute coronary syndromes presenting with non-obstructive coronary artery disease? The case for intravascular imaging. Buccheri D; Piraino D; Orrego PS; Cortese B Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 203():1125-6. PubMed ID: 26608014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guidance. Waksman R; Kitabata H; Prati F; Albertucci M; Mintz GS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(17 Suppl):S32-40. PubMed ID: 24135661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Endothelial dysfunction versus early atherosclerosis: a study with high resolution imaging. Manfrini O; Cenko E; Verna E; Salerno Uriarte JA; Bugiardini R Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1714-6. PubMed ID: 23608395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA. Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions. Bourantas CV; Papafaklis MI; Lakkas L; Sakellarios A; Onuma Y; Zhang YJ; Muramatsu T; Diletti R; Bizopoulos P; Kalatzis F; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Wang J; Garcia Garcia HM; Kimura T; Michalis LK; Serruys PW Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 30(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 24458955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravascular imaging of coronary artery disease: recent progress and future directions. Ochijewicz D; Tomaniak M; Koltowski L; Rdzanek A; Pietrasik A; Kochman J J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2017 Oct; 18(10):733-741. PubMed ID: 28834786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]