BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23608479)

  • 1. Nucleus pulposus deformation in response to rotation at L1-2 and L4-5.
    Fazey PJ; Song S; Price RI; Singer KP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jun; 28(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 23608479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nucleus pulposus deformation in response to lumbar spine lateral flexion: an in vivo MRI investigation.
    Fazey PJ; Takasaki H; Singer KP
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1115-20. PubMed ID: 20204426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An MRI investigation of intervertebral disc deformation in response to torsion.
    Fazey PJ; Song S; Mønsås S; Johansson L; Haukalid T; Price RI; Singer KP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 16446019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumbar spine angles and intervertebral disc characteristics with end-range positions in three planes of motion in healthy people using upright MRI.
    Berry DB; Hernandez A; Onodera K; Ingram N; Ward SR; Gombatto SP
    J Biomech; 2019 May; 89():95-104. PubMed ID: 31047693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reality about migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc with changing postures.
    Nazari J; Pope MH; Graveling RA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 22015264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of lumbar intradiscal deformation during flexion and extension, by mathematical analysis of magnetic resonance imaging pixel intensity profiles.
    Brault JS; Driscoll DM; Laakso LL; Kappler RE; Allin EF; Glonek T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep; 22(18):2066-72. PubMed ID: 9322316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The response of the nucleus pulposus of the lumbar intervertebral discs to functionally loaded positions.
    Alexander LA; Hancock E; Agouris I; Smith FW; MacSween A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(14):1508-12. PubMed ID: 17572620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals.
    Edmondston SJ; Song S; Bricknell RV; Davies PA; Fersum K; Humphries P; Wickenden D; Singer KP
    Man Ther; 2000 Aug; 5(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 11034886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal.
    Chung SS; Lee CS; Kim SH; Chung MW; Ahn JM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2000 Apr; 29(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 10855470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical analysis of the influence of nucleus pulposus removal on the biomechanical behavior of a lumbar motion segment.
    Huang J; Yan H; Jian F; Wang X; Li H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(14):1516-24. PubMed ID: 24893132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal plane rotation center of lower lumbar spine during a dynamic weight-lifting activity.
    Liu Z; Tsai TY; Wang S; Wu M; Zhong W; Li JS; Cha T; Wood K; Li G
    J Biomech; 2016 Feb; 49(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 26805460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Cervical Extension on Deformation of Intervertebral Disk and Migration of Nucleus Pulposus.
    Kim YH; Kim SI; Park S; Hong SH; Chung SG
    PM R; 2017 Apr; 9(4):329-338. PubMed ID: 27613586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified quantitative MRI analysis method to identify the direction of shift in lumbar disc hydration over the axial MRI in response to side-bending.
    Takasaki H; Lim EC
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 26407118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
    Drake JD; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 18234402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Migration of the nucleus pulposus within the intervertebral disc during flexion and extension of the spine.
    Fennell AJ; Jones AP; Hukins DW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Dec; 21(23):2753-7. PubMed ID: 8979321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematic analysis of the lumbar spine by digital videofluoroscopy in 18 asymptomatic subjects and 9 patients with herniated nucleus pulposus.
    Lee BW; Lee JE; Lee SH; Kwon HK
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 May; 34(4):221-30. PubMed ID: 21621723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sagittal plane lumbar intervertebral motion during seated flexion-extension radiographs of 658 asymptomatic nondegenerated levels.
    Staub BN; Holman PJ; Reitman CA; Hipp J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 26296193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midlumbar lateral flexion stability measured in healthy volunteers by in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Mellor FE; Muggleton JM; Bagust J; Mason W; Thomas PW; Breen AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E811-7. PubMed ID: 19829245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of lordosis on the position of the nucleus pulposus in supine subjects. A study using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Beattie PF; Brooks WM; Rothstein JM; Sibbitt WL; Robergs RA; MacLean T; Hart BL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Sep; 19(18):2096-102. PubMed ID: 7825052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.