BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23611334)

  • 1. SAKE: a new quantification tool for positron emission tomography studies.
    Veronese M; Rizzo G; Turkheimer FE; Bertoldo A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):199-213. PubMed ID: 23611334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies: A Review of 20 Years of Method Developments and Applications.
    Veronese M; Rizzo G; Bertoldo A; Turkheimer FE
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7187541. PubMed ID: 28050197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voxelwise quantification of [(11)C](R)-rolipram PET data: a comparison between model-based and data-driven methods.
    Rizzo G; Veronese M; Zanotti-Fregonara P; Bertoldo A
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2013 Jul; 33(7):1032-40. PubMed ID: 23512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rank-shaping regularization of exponential spectral analysis for application to functional parametric mapping.
    Turkheimer FE; Hinz R; Gunn RN; Aston JA; Gunn SR; Cunningham VJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 48(23):3819-41. PubMed ID: 14703160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An open tool for input function estimation and quantification of dynamic PET FDG brain scans.
    Bertrán M; Martínez N; Carbajal G; Fernández A; Gómez Á
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Aug; 11(8):1419-30. PubMed ID: 26514683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-graphical analysis of dynamic PET.
    Zhou Y; Ye W; Brasić JR; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):2947-57. PubMed ID: 19931403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global-two-stage filtering of clinical PET parametric maps: application to [(11)C]-(R)-PK11195.
    Tomasi G; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C; Pavese N; Tai YF; Hammers A; Turkheimer FE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):942-53. PubMed ID: 21195193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A consistent and efficient graphical analysis method to improve the quantification of reversible tracer binding in radioligand receptor dynamic PET studies.
    Zhou Y; Ye W; Brasić JR; Crabb AH; Hilton J; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):661-70. PubMed ID: 18930830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.
    Gatidis S; Würslin C; Seith F; Schäfer JF; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 26929936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging.
    Shidahara M; Ikoma Y; Kershaw J; Kimura Y; Naganawa M; Watabe H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-86. PubMed ID: 17876550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a compartmental model for estimating tumor hypoxia via FMISO dynamic PET imaging.
    Wang W; Georgi JC; Nehmeh SA; Narayanan M; Paulus T; Bal M; O'Donoghue J; Zanzonico PB; Schmidtlein CR; Lee NY; Humm JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3083-99. PubMed ID: 19420418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of aromatase binding in the female human brain using [
    Jonasson M; Nordeman P; Eriksson J; Wilking H; Wikström J; Takahashi K; Niwa T; Hosoya T; Watanabe Y; Antoni G; Sundström Poromaa I; Lubberink M; Comasco E
    J Neurosci Res; 2020 Nov; 98(11):2208-2218. PubMed ID: 32761874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Unified Framework for Plasma Data Modeling in Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography Studies.
    Tonietto M; Rizzo G; Veronese M; Borgan F; Bloomfield PS; Howes O; Bertoldo A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 66(5):1447-1455. PubMed ID: 30307849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching for alternatives to full kinetic analysis in 18F-FDG PET: an extension of the simplified kinetic analysis method.
    Hapdey S; Buvat I; Carson JM; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 21421718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of linear least-squares, nonlinear least-squares, and Patlak graphical method for regional and local quantitative tracer kinetic modeling in cerebral dynamic
    Ben Bouallègue F; Vauchot F; Mariano-Goulart D
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1260-1271. PubMed ID: 30592540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a reference tissue model with spatial constraint to quantify [11C]Pittsburgh compound B PET for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
    Zhou Y; Resnick SM; Ye W; Fan H; Holt DP; Klunk WE; Mathis CA; Dannals R; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jun; 36(2):298-312. PubMed ID: 17449282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric Method Performance for Dynamic 3'-Deoxy-3'-
    Kramer GM; Frings V; Heijtel D; Smit EF; Hoekstra OS; Boellaard R;
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jun; 58(6):920-925. PubMed ID: 28572289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral analysis of dynamic PET studies.
    Cunningham VJ; Jones T
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1993 Jan; 13(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 8417003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of preprocessing strategies in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) neuroimaging: A [
    Nørgaard M; Ganz M; Svarer C; Frokjaer VG; Greve DN; Strother SC; Knudsen GM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():466-479. PubMed ID: 31158479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.