391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23611391)
21. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Arslan H
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1182-5. PubMed ID: 25069929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):537-42. PubMed ID: 24460041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Scouting Ability of 4 Pathfinding Instruments in Moderately Curved Molar Canals.
De-Deus G; Belladonna FG; Souza EM; Alves Vde O; Silva EJ; Rodrigues E; Versiani MA; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1540-4. PubMed ID: 27663618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of torsional loading of nickel-titanium instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance.
Cheung GS; Oh SH; Ha JH; Kim SK; Park SH; Kim HC
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1593-7. PubMed ID: 24238454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis.
Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Jardine AP; Rosa RA; Santini MF; Zaccara IM; Só MV; Kopper PM
Braz Oral Res; 2016 Jun; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27305517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of dentinal damage during canal preparation using reciprocating and rotary files.
Kansal R; Rajput A; Talwar S; Roongta R; Verma M
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1443-6. PubMed ID: 25146029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of movement kinematics on the cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments.
Karataş E; Arslan H; Büker M; Seçkin F; Çapar ID
Int Endod J; 2016 Apr; 49(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 25816834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals.
Pasqualini D; Bianchi CC; Paolino DS; Mancini L; Cemenasco A; Cantatore G; Castellucci A; Berutti E
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22341081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bending Resistance and Cyclic Fatigue Life of Reciproc, Unicone, and WaveOne Reciprocating Instruments.
Silva EJ; Villarino LS; Vieira VT; Accorsi-Mendonça T; Antunes HD; De-Deus G; Lopes HP
J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1789-1793. PubMed ID: 27776886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
