BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23611860)

  • 1. A switching multi-scale dynamical network model of EEG/MEG.
    Olier I; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; El-Deredy W
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():262-87. PubMed ID: 23611860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mesostate-space model for EEG and MEG.
    Daunizeau J; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17761440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can we observe collective neuronal activity from macroscopic aggregate signals?
    Hadjipapas A; Casagrande E; Nevado A; Barnes GR; Green G; Holliday IE
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1290-303. PubMed ID: 19041404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging.
    Wipf D; Nagarajan S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):947-66. PubMed ID: 18602278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a variational scheme for model inversion of multi-area model of brain. Part I: simulation evaluation.
    Babajani-Feremi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Math Biosci; 2011 Jan; 229(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 21070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
    Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Algorithmic procedures for Bayesian MEG/EEG source reconstruction in SPM.
    López JD; Litvak V; Espinosa JJ; Friston K; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():476-87. PubMed ID: 24041874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models.
    Penny W; Sengupta B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004797. PubMed ID: 26942606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction: stability and pattern formation in networks of dynamical systems.
    Boccaletti S; Pecora LM
    Chaos; 2006 Mar; 16(1):015101. PubMed ID: 16599767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of number of independent brain electric sources from the scalp EEGs.
    Bai X; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1883-92. PubMed ID: 17019851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized shrinking LORETA-FOCUSS (SSLOFO): a new algorithm for spatio-temporal EEG source reconstruction.
    Liu H; Schimpf PH; Dong G; Gao X; Yang F; Gao S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1681-91. PubMed ID: 16235654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG-like signals generated by a simple chaotic model based on the logistic equation.
    Perea G; Márquez-Gamiño S; Rodríguez S; Moreno G
    J Neural Eng; 2006 Sep; 3(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 16921208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.