226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23611993)
1. Electrically elicited visual evoked potentials in Argus II retinal implant wearers.
Stronks HC; Barry MP; Dagnelie G
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3891-901. PubMed ID: 23611993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina.
Pérez Fornos A; Sommerhalder J; da Cruz L; Sahel JA; Mohand-Said S; Hafezi F; Pelizzone M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):2720-31. PubMed ID: 22447863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation.
Greenwald SH; Horsager A; Humayun MS; Greenberg RJ; McMahon MJ; Fine I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5017-25. PubMed ID: 19608533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a silicon retinal implant: cortical evoked potentials following focal stimulation of the rabbit retina with light and electricity.
Nadig MN
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Sep; 110(9):1545-53. PubMed ID: 10479021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of extraocular electrodes for a retinal prosthesis using evoked potentials in cat visual cortex.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
J Clin Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 12(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 16051097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical responses elicited by photovoltaic subretinal prostheses exhibit similarities to visually evoked potentials.
Mandel Y; Goetz G; Lavinsky D; Huie P; Mathieson K; Wang L; Kamins T; Galambos L; Manivanh R; Harris J; Palanker D
Nat Commun; 2013; 4():1980. PubMed ID: 23778557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked electroretinograms and pupil responses in Argus II retinal implant wearers.
Stronks HC; Barry MP; Dagnelie G
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 26743880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.
Li L; Cao P; Sun M; Chai X; Wu K; Xu X; Li X; Ren Q
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):349-61. PubMed ID: 18989689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term Repeatability and Reproducibility of Phosphene Characteristics in Chronically Implanted Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects.
Luo YH; Zhong JJ; Clemo M; da Cruz L
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():100-109. PubMed ID: 27491695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users.
Hou Y; Nanduri D; Granley J; Weiland JD; Beyeler M
J Neural Eng; 2024 Apr; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 38457841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoring Color Perception to the Blind: An Electrical Stimulation Strategy of Retina in Patients with End-stage Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Yue L; Castillo J; Gonzalez AC; Neitz J; Humayun MS
Ophthalmology; 2021 Mar; 128(3):453-462. PubMed ID: 32858064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatiotemporal interactions in the visual cortex following paired electrical stimulation of the retina.
Cicione R; Fallon JB; Rathbone GD; Williams CE; Shivdasani MN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):7726-38. PubMed ID: 25370517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.
Nanduri D; Fine I; Horsager A; Boynton GM; Humayun MS; Greenberg RJ; Weiland JD
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jan; 53(1):205-14. PubMed ID: 22110084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ten-Year Follow-up of a Blind Patient Chronically Implanted with Epiretinal Prosthesis Argus I.
Yue L; Falabella P; Christopher P; Wuyyuru V; Dorn J; Schor P; Greenberg RJ; Weiland JD; Humayun MS
Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2545-52.e1. PubMed ID: 26386850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects.
Horsager A; Boynton GM; Greenberg RJ; Fine I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 52(1):549-57. PubMed ID: 20720224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses.
de Balthasar C; Patel S; Roy A; Freda R; Greenwald S; Horsager A; Mahadevappa M; Yanai D; McMahon MJ; Humayun MS; Greenberg RJ; Weiland JD; Fine I
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2303-14. PubMed ID: 18515576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.
Shivdasani MN; Sinclair NC; Dimitrov PN; Varsamidis M; Ayton LN; Luu CD; Perera T; McDermott HJ; Blamey PJ;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 55(10):6467-81. PubMed ID: 25205858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimized single pulse stimulation strategy for retinal implants.
Savage CO; Grayden DB; Meffin H; Burkitt AN
J Neural Eng; 2013 Feb; 10(1):016003. PubMed ID: 23220887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants.
Beyeler M; Nanduri D; Weiland JD; Rokem A; Boynton GM; Fine I
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9199. PubMed ID: 31235711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
