These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23612680)

  • 1. Genetic modifications for personal enhancement: a defence.
    Murphy TF
    J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 40(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 23612680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventing ultimate harm as the justification for biomoral modification.
    Murphy TF
    Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 25186171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the genetic modification of psychology, personality, and behavior.
    Neitzke AB
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2012 Dec; 22(4):307-43. PubMed ID: 23420940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.
    Murphy TF
    Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):335-42. PubMed ID: 23025348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm': an argument against moral enhancement.
    Tonkens R
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 41(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24748649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parental wisdom, empirical blindness, and normative evaluation of prenatal genetic enhancement.
    Tonkens R
    J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 21597084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children.
    Tonkens R
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Oct; 37(10):606-10. PubMed ID: 21546517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who should pay for bad genes?
    Rakowski E
    Calif Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 90(5):1345-414. PubMed ID: 12436972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive autonomy as self-making: procreative liberty and the practice of ethical subjectivity.
    Mills C
    J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):639-56. PubMed ID: 24225390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience of agency and sense of responsibility.
    Moretto G; Walsh E; Haggard P
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1847-54. PubMed ID: 21920776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Striving for the moral self: the effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior.
    Jordan J; Mullen E; Murnighan JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 May; 37(5):701-13. PubMed ID: 21402752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ethics of impossible and possible changes to human nature.
    Murphy TF
    Bioethics; 2012 May; 26(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 21133975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "the moral sentiments": evidence from economic experiments.
    Bowles S
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5883):1605-9. PubMed ID: 18566278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan.
    DeGrazia D
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar; 38(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 22074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and Recommendations.
    Parens E; Asch A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):S1-22. PubMed ID: 10587809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parenting in an era of genetics.
    McGee G
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):16-22. PubMed ID: 9131347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respect for personal autonomy, human dignity, and the problems of self-directedness and botched autonomy.
    Barilan YM
    J Med Philos; 2011 Oct; 36(5):496-515. PubMed ID: 22021657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive choice, enhancement, and the moral continuum argument.
    Malmqvist E
    J Med Philos; 2014 Feb; 39(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24334271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.