152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23613506)
1. Are practical recommendations practiced? A national multi-centre cross-sectional study on frequency of visual field testing in glaucoma.
Fung SS; Lemer C; Russell RA; Malik R; Crabb DP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 97(7):843-7. PubMed ID: 23613506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Visual Field Progression Rates Among the High Tension Glaucoma, Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma, and Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Ballae Ganeshrao S; Senthil S; Choudhari N; Sri Durgam S; Garudadri CS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Mar; 60(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 30835290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma.
Rao HL; Addepalli UK; Jonnadula GB; Kumbar T; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):719-24. PubMed ID: 22595936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors.
Musch DC; Gillespie BW; Lichter PR; Niziol LM; Janz NK;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 19019444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study.
Musch DC; Gillespie BW; Niziol LM; Lichter PR; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1766-73. PubMed ID: 21600658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Progression from ocular hypertension to visual field loss in the English hospital eye service.
Kelly SR; Khawaja AP; Bryan SR; Azuara-Blanco A; Sparrow JM; Crabb DP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32217541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using filtered forecasting techniques to determine personalized monitoring schedules for patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Schell GJ; Lavieri MS; Helm JE; Liu X; Musch DC; Van Oyen MP; Stein JD
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1539-46. PubMed ID: 24704136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between 24-h continuous intraocular pressure measurement with a contact lens sensor and visual field progression.
Tojo N; Hayashi A; Otsuka M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 258(1):175-182. PubMed ID: 31659459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cataract Surgery and Rate of Visual Field Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Kim JH; Rabiolo A; Morales E; Fatehi N; Lee WS; Yu F; Afifi AA; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 201():19-30. PubMed ID: 30703355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Progression pattern of initial parafoveal scotomas in glaucoma.
Su D; Park SC; Simonson JL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 23149129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary open-angle glaucoma in a population associated with high prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma: the Kumejima Study.
Yamamoto S; Sawaguchi S; Iwase A; Yamamoto T; Abe H; Tomita G; Tomidokoro A; Araie M
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 24746386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Suspect Preferred Practice Patterns in a Retail-based Eye Clinic.
Stanley J; Huisingh CE; Swain TA; McGwin G; Owsley C; Girkin CA; Rhodes LA
J Glaucoma; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1068-1072. PubMed ID: 30234750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
Caprioli J; Coleman AL
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patterns of adherence to NICE glaucoma guidance in two different service delivery models.
Chawla A; Patel I; Yuen C; Fenerty C
Eye (Lond); 2012 Nov; 26(11):1412-7. PubMed ID: 22935671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual Field Progression in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Using Pointwise Linear Regression Analysis.
Verma S; Nongpiur ME; Atalay E; Wei X; Husain R; Goh D; Perera SA; Aung T
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):1065-1071. PubMed ID: 28372858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive Value of the Water Drinking Test and the Risk of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression.
De Moraes CG; Susanna R; Sakata LM; Hatanaka M
J Glaucoma; 2017 Sep; 26(9):767-773. PubMed ID: 28731935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.
Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More frequent, more costly? Health economic modelling aspects of monitoring glaucoma patients in England.
Boodhna T; Crabb DP
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):611. PubMed ID: 27770792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
