356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23615167)
1. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech-in-noise and subjective benefit with active middle ear implant omnidirectional and directional microphones: a within-subjects comparison.
Wolframm MD; Giarbini N; Streitberger C
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 22569145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Year Follow-Up with the Bone Conduction Implant.
Persson AC; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Rigato C; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(5):263-275. PubMed ID: 32268333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. First clinical experiences with a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator in comparison to preoperative fitted conventional hearing aids.
Busch S; Kruck S; Spickers D; Leuwer R; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Plinkert PK; Mojallal H; Schwab B; Maier H; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1711-8. PubMed ID: 24232068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss.
Barbara M; Perotti M; Gioia B; Volpini L; Monini S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 133(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 23768011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone conductive implants in single-sided deafness.
Monini S; Musy I; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 135(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 25720582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individualised headband simulation test for predicting outcome after percutaneous bone conductive implantation.
Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Biagini M; Lazzarino AI; Barbara M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 26824212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features.
Curca IA; Parsa V; Macpherson EA; Scollie S; Vansevenant K; Zimmerman K; Lewis-Teeter J; Allen P; Parnes L; Agrawal S
Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):556-565. PubMed ID: 32069128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
