BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23615523)

  • 1. Reliability of a Swedish pre-hospital dispatch system in prioritizing patients.
    Ek B; Edström P; Toutin A; Svedlund M
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2013 Apr; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 23615523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.
    Hjälte L; Suserud BO; Herlitz J; Karlberg I
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 14(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 17473609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Norwegian emergency medical dispatch classification as non-urgent predict no need for pre-hospital medical treatment? An observational study.
    Grusd E; Kramer-Johansen J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 May; 24():65. PubMed ID: 27154472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is ambulance telephone triage using advanced medical priority dispatch protocols able to identify patients with acute stroke correctly?
    Deakin CD; Alasaad M; King P; Thompson F
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jun; 26(6):442-5. PubMed ID: 19465622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.
    Dale J; Williams S; Foster T; Higgins J; Snooks H; Crouch R; Hartley-Sharpe C; Glucksman E; George S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13(5):363-73. PubMed ID: 15465940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial emergency medical dispatching and prehospital needs assessment: a prospective study of the Swedish ambulance service.
    Hjälte L; Suserud BO; Herlitz J; Karlberg I
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 14(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 17473606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does telephone triage of emergency (999) calls using Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch (AMPDS) with Department of Health (DH) call prioritisation effectively identify patients with an acute coronary syndrome? An audit of 42,657 emergency calls to Hampshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust.
    Deakin CD; Sherwood DM; Smith A; Cassidy M
    Emerg Med J; 2006 Mar; 23(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 16498168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple three-step dispatch rule may reduce lights and sirens responses to motor vehicle crashes.
    Isenberg D; Cone DC; Stiell IG
    Emerg Med J; 2012 Jul; 29(7):592-5. PubMed ID: 21856707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a system to determine EMS dispatch priorities.
    Palumbo L; Kubincanek J; Emerman C; Jouriles N; Cydulka R; Shade B
    Am J Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 14(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 8768162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency nursing staff dispatch: sensitivity and specificity in detecting prehospital need for physician interventions during ambulance transport in Rovigo Emergency Ambulance Service, Italy.
    Leopardi M; Sommacampagna M
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Oct; 28(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 23947338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How many emergency dispatches occurred per cardiac arrest?
    Johnson NJ; Sporer KA
    Resuscitation; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1499-504. PubMed ID: 20638764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity and specificity of the medical priority dispatch system in detecting cardiac arrest emergency calls in Melbourne.
    Flynn J; Archer F; Morgans A
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2006; 21(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 16770995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of prehospital dispatch protocols to identify low-acuity patients.
    Studnek JR; Thestrup L; Blackwell T; Bagwell B
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 22239124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of nature of call screening tool in identifying patients requiring treatment for out of hospital cardiac arrest.
    Green JD; Ewings S; Wortham R; Walsh B
    Emerg Med J; 2019 Apr; 36(4):203-207. PubMed ID: 30728188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch.
    Dale J; Higgins J; Williams S; Foster T; Snooks H; Crouch R; Hartley-Sharpe C; Glucksman E; Hooper R; George S
    Emerg Med J; 2003 Mar; 20(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 12642540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can emergency medical dispatch systems safely reduce first-responder call volume?
    Cone DC; Galante N; MacMillan DS
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2008; 12(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 18924012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical priority dispatch codes-comparison with National Early Warning Score.
    Hoikka M; Länkimäki S; Silfvast T; Ala-Kokko TI
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 24(1):142. PubMed ID: 27912778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Which emergency medical dispatch codes predict high prehospital nontransport rates in an urban community?
    Hodell EM; Sporer KA; Brown JF
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24028558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy.
    Torlén K; Kurland L; Castrén M; Olanders K; Bohm K
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 25(1):122. PubMed ID: 29284542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency medical service systems in Japan: past, present, and future.
    Tanigawa K; Tanaka K
    Resuscitation; 2006 Jun; 69(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 16740355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.