144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23615569)
1. Laboratory diagnostic outcome applying detection criteria recommended by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the ISTH on Lupus Anticoagulant.
Chantarangkul V; Biguzzi E; Asti D; Palmucci C; Tripodi A
Thromb Haemost; 2013 Jul; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23615569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Laboratory examinations in antiphospholipid syndrome].
Ieko M; Naito S; Yoshida M
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Apr; 58(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 20496762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New guidelines for lupus anticoagulant: sensitivity and specificity of cut-off values calculated with plasmas from healthy controls in mixing and confirmatory tests.
Martinuzzo ME; Cerrato GS; Varela ML; Adamczuk YP; Forastiero RR
Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Apr; 34(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 22032515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent guidelines and recommendations for laboratory detection of lupus anticoagulants.
Moore GW
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2014 Mar; 40(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 24500573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lupus anticoagulant detection in anticoagulated patients. Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Tripodi A; Cohen H; Devreese KMJ
J Thromb Haemost; 2020 Jul; 18(7):1569-1575. PubMed ID: 32619349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of lupus anticoagulants: an update on quality in laboratory testing.
Adams M
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2013 Apr; 39(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 23424052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of the mixing test in laboratory diagnoses of lupus anticoagulant: the fate of the mixing test in integrated lupus anticoagulant test systems.
Hong SK; Hwang SM; Kim JE; Kim HK
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Dec; 23(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 22964767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and laboratory practice for lupus anticoagulant testing: An International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee survey.
Cohen H; Mackie IJ; Devreese KMJ;
J Thromb Haemost; 2019 Oct; 17(10):1715-1732. PubMed ID: 31271706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cross-mixing test to detect lupus anticoagulant for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome].
Ieko M; Naito S; Yoshida M
Rinsho Byori; 2009 Oct; 57(10):990-8. PubMed ID: 19928497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of confirmatory assays for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection].
Imoto K; Yasumuro Y; Taki M; Suzuki Y; Akatu S; Tajima C; Ichikawa Y
Rinsho Byori; 1996 Aug; 44(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 8816068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diluted Russell viper-venom time improves identification of antiphospholipid syndrome in a lupus anticoagulant-positive patient population.
Lambert M; Ferrard-Sasson G; Dubucquoi S; Hachulla E; Prin L; Hatron PY; Goudemand J; Boffa MC; Caron C
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Mar; 101(3):577-81. PubMed ID: 19277423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Activated Seven Lupus Anticoagulant (ASLA) test has comparable sensitivity to classical assays for screening of lupus anticoagulant.
Marinuzzo M; Adamczuk Y; Varela ML; Pombo G; Forastiero R
Thromb Haemost; 2005 May; 93(5):1007-9. PubMed ID: 15900652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation.
Devreese KMJ; de Groot PG; de Laat B; Erkan D; Favaloro EJ; Mackie I; Martinuzzo M; Ortel TL; Pengo V; Rand JH; Tripodi A; Wahl D; Cohen H
J Thromb Haemost; 2020 Nov; 18(11):2828-2839. PubMed ID: 33462974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimisation of lupus anticoagulant tests: should test samples always be mixed with normal plasma?
Pennings MT; De Groot PG; Meijers JC; Huisman A; Derksen RH; Urbanus RT
Thromb Haemost; 2014 Oct; 112(4):736-42. PubMed ID: 25008787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of silica clotting time method for lupus anticoagulant in a clinical population with various symptoms of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Averina M; Johannesen S; Brox J
Lupus; 2016 Apr; 25(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 26612052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commonalities and contrasts in recent guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection.
Moore GW
Int J Lab Hematol; 2014 Jun; 36(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 24750683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: a plethora of obstacles to overcome.
Devreese K; Hoylaerts MF
Eur J Haematol; 2009 Jul; 83(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19226362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. To mix or not to mix in lupus anticoagulant testing? That is the question.
Tripodi A
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2012 Jun; 38(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 22618530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mixing test specific cut-off is more sensitive at detecting lupus anticoagulants than index of circulating anticoagulant.
Moore GW; Culhane AP; Daw CR; Noronha CP; Kumano O
Thromb Res; 2016 Mar; 139():98-101. PubMed ID: 26916303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical diagnosis of thrombosis and blood coagulation tests].
Watanabe K
Rinsho Byori; 1998 Mar; 46(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 9564763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
