318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23616125)
1. Prevalence of flat lesions in a large screening population and their role in colonoscopy quality improvement.
Reinhart K; Bannert C; Dunkler D; Salzl P; Trauner M; Renner F; Knoflach P; Ferlitsch A; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 23616125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors associated with colorectal flat adenoma detection.
Nicolás-Pérez D; Parra-Blanco A; Gimeno-García AZ; Ortega-Sánchez JA; Carrillo-Palau M; Jiménez-Sosa A; Quintero-Carrion E
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Mar; 25(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 23169312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the clinicopathologic features between flat and polypoid adenoma.
Kil Lee S; Il Kim T; Kwan Shin S; Ho Kim W; Kim H; Kyu Kim N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(9):1116-21. PubMed ID: 18609172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical factors associated with non-polypoid colonic adenomas ≥6 mm: a prospective study in an asymptomatic population using a high-definition colonoscope.
Johnson ME; Feinn R; Anderson JC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 106(11):2018-22. PubMed ID: 21971537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.
Racho RG; Krishna M; Coe SG; Thomas CS; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 28444509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?
O'brien MJ; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Bushey MT; Sternberg SS; Gottlieb LS; Bond JH; Waye JD; Schapiro M;
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Oct; 2(10):905-11. PubMed ID: 15476154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.
Hurlstone DP; Cross SS; Drew K; Adam I; Shorthouse AJ; Brown S; Sanders DS; Lobo AJ
Endoscopy; 2004 Jun; 36(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 15202044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic appearance of proximal colorectal neoplasms and potential implications for colonoscopy in cancer prevention.
Rondagh EJ; Bouwens MW; Riedl RG; Winkens B; de Ridder R; Kaltenbach T; Soetikno RM; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1218-25. PubMed ID: 22482917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study.
Brenner H; Chang-Claude J; Jansen L; Seiler CM; Hoffmeister M
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 22910933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequent co-occurrence of high-grade dysplasia in large flat colonic polyps (>20 mm) and synchronous polyps.
Zhan T; Hahn F; Hielscher T; Betge J; Kähler G; Ebert MP; Belle S
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 15():82. PubMed ID: 26160557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.
Sherer EA; Imler TD; Imperiale TF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 22138085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.
Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 'difficult' polyp: pitfalls for endoscopic removal.
Jung M
Dig Dis; 2012; 30 Suppl 2():74-80. PubMed ID: 23207936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.
Leffler DA; Kheraj R; Bhansali A; Yamanaka H; Neeman N; Sheth S; Sawhney M; Lamont JT; Aronson MD
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 22341102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
