156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23616248)
1. Microdosimetric calculation of penumbra for biological dose in wobbled carbon-ion beams with Monte Carlo Method.
Tamura M; Komori M; Oguchi H; Iwamoto Y; Rachi T; Ota K; Hemmi A; Shimozato T; Obata Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 23616248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A modified microdosimetric kinetic model for relative biological effectiveness calculation.
Chen Y; Li J; Li C; Qiu R; Wu Z
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015008. PubMed ID: 29240558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extension of matRad with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model for carbon ion treatment planning: Comparison with Monte Carlo calculation.
Yoon E; Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; Jung S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5884-5896. PubMed ID: 37162309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A trichrome beam model for biological dose calculation in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning.
Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):437-51. PubMed ID: 25658007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculation of out-of-field dose distribution in carbon-ion radiotherapy by Monte Carlo simulation.
Yonai S; Matsufuji N; Namba M
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5028-39. PubMed ID: 22894428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calculating dose-averaged linear energy transfer in an analytical treatment planning system for carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Wang W; Li P; Shahnazi K; Wu X; Zhao J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13866. PubMed ID: 36527366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of biological dose calculation for carbon ion therapy with a monte carlo method.
Nose H; Aso T; Kase Y; Matsufuji N; Kanai T
Igaku Butsuri; 2009; 28(4):132-41. PubMed ID: 21976254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateral variations of radiobiological properties of therapeutic fields of
Dewey S; Burigo L; Pshenichnov I; Mishustin I; Bleicher M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5884-5907. PubMed ID: 28557800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological dose calculation with Monte Carlo physics simulation for heavy-ion radiotherapy.
Kase Y; Kanematsu N; Kanai T; Matsufuji N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):N467-75. PubMed ID: 17148817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microdosimetry-based relative biological effectiveness calculations for radiotherapeutic electron beams: a FLUKA-based study.
Chattaraj A; Selvam TP
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Sep; 14(3):297-308. PubMed ID: 34216005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the NIRS approach for clinical dose calculations in carbon ion therapy.
Magro G; Dahle TJ; Molinelli S; Ciocca M; Fossati P; Ferrari A; Inaniwa T; Matsufuji N; Ytre-Hauge KS; Mairani A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3814-3827. PubMed ID: 28252446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A methodology to abridge microdosimetric distributions without a significant loss of the spectral information needed for the RBE computation in carbon ion therapy.
Parisi A; Beltran CJ; Furutani KM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e14049. PubMed ID: 37227694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimations of relative biological effectiveness of secondary fragments in carbon ion irradiation of water using CR-39 plastic detector and microdosimetric kinetic model.
Hirano Y; Kodaira S; Souda H; Osaki K; Torikoshi M
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):781-789. PubMed ID: 31705815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative biological effectiveness for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ion beams using passive and scanning techniques evaluated with fully 3D silicon microdosimeters.
Tran LT; Bolst D; Guatelli S; Pogossov A; Petasecca M; Lerch MLF; Chartier L; Prokopovich DA; Reinhard MI; Povoli M; Kok A; Perevertaylo VL; Matsufuji N; Kanai T; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2299-2308. PubMed ID: 29572856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Monte Carlo approach to the microdosimetric kinetic model to account for dose rate time structure effects in ion beam therapy with application in treatment planning simulations.
Manganaro L; Russo G; Cirio R; Dalmasso F; Giordanengo S; Monaco V; Muraro S; Sacchi R; Vignati A; Attili A
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 28130821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of ridge filters for spread-out Bragg peaks with Monte Carlo simulation in carbon ion therapy.
Sakama M; Kanai T; Kase Y; Yusa K; Tashiro M; Torikai K; Shimada H; Yamada S; Ohno T; Nakano T
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6615-33. PubMed ID: 23022653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reformulation of a clinical-dose system for carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan.
Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Matsufuji N; Kanai T; Shirai T; Noda K; Tsuji H; Kamada T; Tsujii H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3271-86. PubMed ID: 25826534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity study of the microdosimetric kinetic model parameters for carbon ion radiotherapy.
Dahle TJ; Magro G; Ytre-Hauge KS; Stokkevåg CH; Choi K; Mairani A
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(22):225016. PubMed ID: 30418940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 2). Chapter 2. Biophysical model, treatment planning system and image guided radiotherapy.
Endo M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Jun; 16(2):137-159. PubMed ID: 37129777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the relative biological effectiveness of active-energy scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy on a commercial treatment planning system with a microdosimetic kinetic model.
Wang W; Sun W; Shen H; Zhao J
Radiat Oncol; 2023 May; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 37198685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
