These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23616435)

  • 1. Investigation of a safety-engineered device to prevent needlestick injury: why has not StatLock stuck?
    Griswold S; Bonaroti A; Rieder CJ; Erbayri J; Parsons J; Nocera R; Hamilton R
    BMJ Open; 2013; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 23616435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
    Ottino MC; Argentero A; Argentero PA; Garzaro G; Zotti CM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elimination of Lancet-Related Needlestick Injuries Using a Safety-Engineered Lancet: Experience in a Hospital.
    An HS; Ko S; Bang JH; Park SW
    Infect Chemother; 2018 Dec; 50(4):319-327. PubMed ID: 30600655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?
    Schuurmans J; Lutgens SP; Groen L; Schneeberger PM
    J Hosp Infect; 2018 Sep; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29738783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.
    Dulon M; Stranzinger J; Wendeler D; Nienhaus A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33255337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H; Yamanaka N
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
    Tosini W; Ciotti C; Goyer F; Lolom I; L'Hériteau F; Abiteboul D; Pellissier G; Bouvet E
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.
    Dulon M; Lisiak B; Wendeler D; Nienhaus A
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Mar; 95(3):306-311. PubMed ID: 28034473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.
    Hanmore E; Maclaine G; Garin F; Alonso A; Leroy N; Ruff L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Nov; 13():489. PubMed ID: 24274747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.
    Cooke CE; Stephens JM
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2017; 10():225-235. PubMed ID: 29033615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.
    Lamontagne F; Abiteboul D; Lolom I; Pellissier G; Tarantola A; Descamps JM; Bouvet E
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17230383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of a Novel Intraoperative Engineered Sharps Injury Prevention Device: Pilot Usability and Efficacy Trial.
    Jenny H; Reategui Via Y Rada M; Yesantharao P; Xun H; Redett R; Sacks JM; Yang R
    JMIR Perioper Med; 2020 Nov; 3(2):e19729. PubMed ID: 33393914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea.
    Park S; Jeong I; Huh J; Yoon Y; Lee S; Choi C
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Aug; 36(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 18675151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ballout RA; Diab B; Harb AC; Tarabay R; Khamassi S; Akl EA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Sep; 16():458. PubMed ID: 27581947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the risk of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers after a needlestick injury in Taiwan.
    Shiao J; Guo L; McLaws ML
    Am J Infect Control; 2002 Feb; 30(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11852411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation of safety-engineered devices and training in reducing needlestick injuries among healthcare workers in South Africa.
    De Jager P; Zungu M; Dyers RE
    S Afr Med J; 2018 May; 108(6):477-483. PubMed ID: 30004327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of pain physicians: Needlesticks injuries.
    Moheimani R; Arastoo S; Lowder R; Reddy R; Kim H; Chen A; Pangarkar S
    Pain Pract; 2023 Jul; 23(6):626-630. PubMed ID: 37067198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention.
    Jackson AP; Almerol LA; Campbell J; Hamilton L
    Br J Nurs; 2020 Jul; 29(14):S22-S30. PubMed ID: 32697642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiology of needlestick and sharps injuries among nurses in a Japanese teaching hospital.
    Smith DR; Mihashi M; Adachi Y; Nakashima Y; Ishitake T
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Sep; 64(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16835002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.