These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23617341)

  • 1. Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?
    Bluekens AM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2013 May; 13(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 23617341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone].
    Scherz N
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening: options beyond the mammogram. The mammogram remains the foundation of breast cancer screening, but variations on this test can improve detection for some women.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2014 Jul; 21(11):3. PubMed ID: 25219012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New screening methods for breast cancer. Techniques are evolving to address issues of inaccuracy and discomfort.
    Duke Med Health News; 2009 Nov; 15(11):6. PubMed ID: 20050207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection.
    Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2. PubMed ID: 26789598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital image processing of screening mammographies: application to masses].
    Viton JL; Seradour B; Rasigni M
    J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 79(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 9757256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full-field digital mammography. A candid assessment.
    Lewin JM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):40-5. PubMed ID: 10623316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photon-counting digital mammography: evaluation of performance under clinically relevant conditions.
    Karellas A
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):913-5. PubMed ID: 22770464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Digital mammography. An alternative to current screening?].
    Langer M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Jul; 146(27-28):14. PubMed ID: 15526654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Point/Counterpoint. Film mammography for breast cancer screening in younger women is no longer appropriate because of the demonstrated superiority of digital mammography for this age group.
    Yaffe MJ; Barnes GT; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):3979-82. PubMed ID: 17153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal invasive biopsy results of "uncertain malignant potential" in digital mammography screening: high prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy.
    Weigel S; Decker T; Korsching E; Biesheuvel C; Wöstmann A; Böcker W; Hungermann D; Roterberg K; Tio J; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2011 Aug; 183(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21506072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography: what next?
    Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5. PubMed ID: 17412132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75. PubMed ID: 10623317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion to digital mammography in a private practice.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Demay S; Kissel D
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 21134525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organisational aspects of mammography screening in digital settings: first experiences of Luxembourg.
    Shannoun F; Schanck JM; Scharpantgen A; Wagnon MC; Ben Daoud M; Back C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 18448438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
    Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan].
    Yamada T; Suzuki A
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.