These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23617388)

  • 1. Commentary: effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations.
    Wakefield C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Apr; 25(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 23617388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of prepolymerized composite megafiller on the marginal adaptation of composite restorations in cavities with different C-factors: an SEM study.
    Bhushan S; Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 21187613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: a SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques.
    Lo Giudice G; Cicciù M; Cervino G; Lizio A; Visco AM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23649060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simplifying finishing and polishing techniques for direct composite restorations.
    Glazer HS
    Dent Today; 2009 Jan; 28(1):122, 124-5. PubMed ID: 19323337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of polishing direction on the marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations.
    St-Pierre L; Bergeron C; Qian F; Hernández MM; Kolker JL; Cobb DS; Vargas MA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Apr; 25(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 23617387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resin composites: Modulus of elasticity and marginal quality.
    Benetti AR; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A; Flury S
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25019363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratification: ancient art form applied to restorative dentistry.
    Terry DA; McLaren EA
    Dent Today; 2001 Sep; 20(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 11569215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish.
    Atabek D; Sillelioglu H; Olmez A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 20533638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures.
    Perez CR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20533640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations.
    LeSage B
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.