These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23619190)

  • 1. Comments on the paper: reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis by Jun Qiao, et al.
    Jacquot FP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 May; 26(3):174. PubMed ID: 23619190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
    Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
    Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
    Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
    Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Allam Y; El-Fiky T; Farghally MY; Al-Sabagh S; Siam AE
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 26223745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
    Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
    De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review.
    Moftian N; Hachesu PR; Pourfeizi HH; Samad-Soltani T; Aghazadeh N; Poureisa M; Salahzadeh Z
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(10):922-932. PubMed ID: 32008520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images.
    Sardjono TA; Wilkinson MH; Veldhuizen AG; van Ooijen PM; Purnama KE; Verkerke GJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):E1256-62. PubMed ID: 23797500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.
    Davis CM; Grant CA; Pearcy MJ; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Little JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):884-893. PubMed ID: 27900714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
    Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
    Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
    Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the Risser sign in a metropolitan scoliosis screening program.
    Hammond KE; Dierckman BD; Burnworth L; Meehan PL; Oswald TS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Dec; 31(8):e80-4. PubMed ID: 22101671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric evaluation of spinal assessment methods to screen for scoliosis in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
    Persson-Bunke M; Czuba T; Hägglund G; Rodby-Bousquet E
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():351. PubMed ID: 26578150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
    Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis.
    Chockalingam N; Dangerfield PH; Giakas G; Cochrane T; Dorgan JC
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Aug; 11(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12193997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.