These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23619535)

  • 1. Reconstruction of pterional defects after frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic craniotomy using Medpor Titan implant: cosmetic results in 98 patients.
    Choudhry OJ; Christiano LD; Arnaout O; Adel JG; Liu JK
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 Sep; 115(9):1716-20. PubMed ID: 23619535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cosmetic Reconstruction of Frontotemporal Depression Using Polyethylene Implant after Pterional Craniotomy.
    Im SH; Song J; Park SK; Rha EY; Han YM
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1982726. PubMed ID: 30420957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome.
    Youssef AS; Willard L; Downes A; Olivera R; Hall K; Agazzi S; van Loveren H
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1275-83. PubMed ID: 22576269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction.
    Liu JK; Gottfried ON; Cole CD; Dougherty WR; Couldwell WT
    Neurosurg Focus; 2004 Mar; 16(3):ECP1. PubMed ID: 15198501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of temporal polyethylene implant after temporalis myofascial flap transposition: clinical and radiographic results from its use in 21 patients.
    Rapidis AD; Day TA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 64(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 16360852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fronto-orbitozygomatic approach: functional and cosmetic outcomes in a series of 169 patients.
    Boari N; Spina A; Giudice L; Gorgoni F; Bailo M; Mortini P
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 128(2):466-474. PubMed ID: 28156247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porous polyethylene implant reconstruction of the orbit after resection of spheno-orbital meningiomas: a novel technique.
    Chambless LB; Mawn LA; Forbes JA; Thompson RC
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 40(1):e28-32. PubMed ID: 21398138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Method for Combining Thin and Thick Malleable Titanium Mesh in the Repair of Cranial Defects.
    Lau D; McDermott MW
    Cureus; 2015 May; 7(5):e267. PubMed ID: 26180691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
    Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of cranial base defects using the Medpor Titan implant: cranioplasty applications in acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Boghani Z; Choudhry OJ; Schmidt RF; Jyung RW; Liu JK
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jun; 123(6):1361-8. PubMed ID: 23371869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconstruction after retrosigmoid approaches using autologous fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty: assessment of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks and headaches in 60 cases.
    Ling PY; Mendelson ZS; Reddy RK; Jyung RW; Liu JK
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Oct; 156(10):1879-88. PubMed ID: 25091535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstruction of cranioplasty using medpor porouspolyethylene implant.
    Marlier B; Kleiber JC; Bannwarth M; Theret E; Eap C; Litre CF
    Neurochirurgie; 2017 Dec; 63(6):468-472. PubMed ID: 29122305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pterional versus superciliary keyhole approach: direct comparison of approach-related complaints and satisfaction in the same patient.
    Park J; Son W; Kwak Y; Ohk B
    J Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 130(1):220-226. PubMed ID: 29498570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anchoring the Temporalis Muscle with an Intact Fascial Layer Along the Superior Temporal Line in Pterional Craniotomy: A Technical Note.
    Rai SKR; Gajbhiye NKS; Mahore A; Dandpat SK; Bhatia K; Vaja TP; Bafna VV; Muzumdar D
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():388-392. PubMed ID: 35654326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures with titanium mesh.
    Marbacher S; Andres RH; Fathi AR; Fandino J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):490-5. PubMed ID: 18362730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-piece orbitozygomatic approach.
    Campero A; Martins C; Socolovsky M; Torino R; Yasuda A; Domitrovic L; Rhoton A
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(suppl_1):ons-E119-ons-E120. PubMed ID: 20173579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fronto-orbital craniotomy reconstruction using the titanium clamp (Craniofix): a technical note.
    Perez-Sanchez X; Umansky F; Margolin E; Spektor S
    Surg Neurol; 2006 Jan; 65(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 16378858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of pterional key hole using three-dimensional titanium plate: technical note.
    Sadatomo T; Yuki K; Migita K; Taniguchi E; Kodama Y; Kurisu K
    Hiroshima J Med Sci; 2005 Jun; 54(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 15991598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom made bioceramic implants in complex and large cranial reconstruction: a two-year follow-up.
    Staffa G; Barbanera A; Faiola A; Fricia M; Limoni P; Mottaran R; Zanotti B; Stefini R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 21640597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The osteomyoplastic flap, a contribution to neurosurgery].
    Grajeda-García FM; Mercado-Caloca F
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2011; 49(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 22176828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.