303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23619781)
1. Raising standards.
Nat Genet; 2013 May; 45(5):467. PubMed ID: 23619781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Raising standards.
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2013 May; 20(5):533. PubMed ID: 23649358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Replication publication.
Patterson M; Cardon L
PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e327. PubMed ID: 16149852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
Heddle NM; Ness P
Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In pursuit of scientific excellence: sex matters.
Miller VM
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Jun; 36(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 22665420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When abstracts conflict with published papers.
DeMaria AN
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1489-90. PubMed ID: 24112818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The new circulation research: a manifesto.
Bolli R
Circ Res; 2010 Feb; 106(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 20133905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges for a research publication: quantity, quality, and crowd wisdom.
Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 64(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 25104533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gel slicing and dicing: a recipe for disaster.
Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 6(4):275. PubMed ID: 15057234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editorial Board Position statement regarding the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recommendations with respect to journal impact factors.
Welk G; Fischman MG; Greenleaf C; Harrison L; Ransdell L; van der Mars H; Zhu W
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):429-30. PubMed ID: 25412123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research and publishing.
Hageman I; Bolwig TG
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):423. PubMed ID: 26372174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When sex matters in biomedical research.
Riederer BM
Lab Anim; 2015 Oct; 49(4):265-6. PubMed ID: 26408524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing Annals value through quality.
Rannou F
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Dec; 57(9-10):553-4. PubMed ID: 25455027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publishing what's important.
Freedman R
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):417-8. PubMed ID: 26396088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Povl Munk-Jørgensen edits left.
Parker G
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):415-6. PubMed ID: 26696380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive analysis of the scientific scope of the papers.
Borchardt RT
J Pharm Sci; 2013 Jan; 102(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 23161071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific theory, the publishing crisis and the wisdom of editors.
Stewart R
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):427. PubMed ID: 26420003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New editors take over.
Westerterp KR; Westerblad H
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2013 Apr; 113(4):823. PubMed ID: 23471684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
