These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23619796)

  • 1. Humans and ecosystems over the coming millennia: overview of a biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.
    Kautsky U; Lindborg T; Valentin J
    Ambio; 2013 May; 42(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 23619796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biosphere assessment of high-level radioactive waste disposal in Sweden.
    Kautsky U; Lindborg T; Valentin J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25431486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches.
    Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A strategy for describing the biosphere at candidate sites for repositories of nuclear waste: linking ecosystem and landscape modeling.
    Lindborg T; Lindborg R; Löfgren A; Söderbäck B; Bradshaw C; Kautsky U
    Ambio; 2006 Dec; 35(8):418-24. PubMed ID: 17334049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of low and intermediate-level radioactive waste on humans and the environment over the next one hundred thousand years.
    Kautsky U; Saetre P; Berglund S; Jaeschke B; Nordén S; Brandefelt J; Keesmann S; Näslund JO; Andersson E
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():395-403. PubMed ID: 26183806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of areas of interest for radiological impact assessments in an evolving landscape context.
    Kłos R; Guerfi R; Dverstorp B; Xu S
    J Environ Radioact; 2023 Jan; 256():107050. PubMed ID: 36368282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radioactive waste: A review.
    Deng D; Zhang L; Dong M; Samuel RE; Ofori-Boadu A; Lamssali M
    Water Environ Res; 2020 Oct; 92(10):1818-1825. PubMed ID: 32860717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. System understanding as a scientific foundation in radioactive waste disposal, legacy site and decommissioning programmes.
    Lindborg T; Ikonen ATK; Kautsky U; Smith G
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Jun; 41(2):. PubMed ID: 33878746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for independent modelling in support of regulatory review of dose assessments.
    Dverstorp B; Xu S
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 Nov; 178-179():446-452. PubMed ID: 28341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Climate considerations in long-term safety assessments for nuclear waste repositories.
    Näslund JO; Brandefelt J; Liljedahl LC
    Ambio; 2013 May; 42(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 23619797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pools and fluxes of organic matter in a boreal landscape: implications for a safety assessment of a repository for nuclear waste.
    Kumblad L; Söderbäck B; Löfgren A; Lindborg T; Wijnbladh E; Kautsky U
    Ambio; 2006 Dec; 35(8):496-504. PubMed ID: 17334057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marine ecosystem modeling beyond the box: using GIS to study carbon fluxes in a coastal ecosystem.
    Wijnbladh E; Jönsson BF; Kumblad L
    Ambio; 2006 Dec; 35(8):484-95. PubMed ID: 17334056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approaches to the definition of potentially exposed groups and potentially exposed populations of biota in the context of solid radioactive waste.
    Griffault L; Aubonnet E; Brown J; Guerfi R; Kautsky U; Kowe R; Saetre P; Shibutani S; Smith G; Smith K; Thorne M; Walke R
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 May; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35593511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From site data to safety assessment: analysis of present and future hydrological conditions at a coastal site in Sweden.
    Berglund S; Bosson E; Sassner M
    Ambio; 2013 May; 42(4):425-34. PubMed ID: 23619800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The scientific base for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel.
    Persson L
    Health Phys; 1993 Apr; 64(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 8449725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of water flow paths: methodology and example calculations for a potential geological repository in Sweden.
    Werner K; Bosson E; Berglund S
    Ambio; 2006 Dec; 35(8):425-34. PubMed ID: 17334050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal.
    Agüero A; Pinedo P; Cancio D; Simón I; Moraleda M; Pérez-Sánchez D; Trueba C
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):36-47. PubMed ID: 17588645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation induced spent nuclear fuel dissolution under deep repository conditions.
    Jonsson M; Nielsen F; Roth O; Ekeroth E; Nilsson S; Hossain MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Oct; 41(20):7087-93. PubMed ID: 17993152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Historical development and evolution of EPRI's post-closure dose assessment of potential releases to the biosphere from the proposed HLW repository at Yucca Mountain.
    Smith G; Kozak MW
    Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 22048489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.