These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620055)

  • 1. Population growth in a wild bird is buffered against phenological mismatch.
    Reed TE; Grøtan V; Jenouvrier S; Sæther BE; Visser ME
    Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6131):488-91. PubMed ID: 23620055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine.
    Reed TE; Jenouvrier S; Visser ME
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 22862682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in phenotypic plasticity and selection patterns in blue tit breeding time: between- and within-population comparisons.
    Porlier M; Charmantier A; Bourgault P; Perret P; Blondel J; Garant D
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):1041-51. PubMed ID: 22568778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population.
    Nussey DH; Postma E; Gienapp P; Visser ME
    Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5746):304-6. PubMed ID: 16224020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of climatic and environmental change in the demography of a multi-brooded passerine, the woodlark Lullula arborea.
    Wright LJ; Hoblyn RA; Green RE; Bowden CG; Mallord JW; Sutherland WJ; Dolman PM
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1191-202. PubMed ID: 19594660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural selection and genetic variation for reproductive reaction norms in a wild bird population.
    Brommer JE; Merilä J; Sheldon BC; Gustafsson L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1362-71. PubMed ID: 16050111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic background, and not ontogenetic effects, affects avian seasonal timing of reproduction.
    Gienapp P; van Noordwijk AJ; Visser ME
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 26(10):2147-53. PubMed ID: 23837446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds.
    Ahola MP; Laaksonen T; Eeva T; Lehikoinen E
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1045-52. PubMed ID: 17922701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for r- and K-selection in a wild bird population: a reciprocal link between ecology and evolution.
    Sæther BE; Visser ME; Grøtan V; Engen S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1829):. PubMed ID: 27122550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tits on the move: exploring the impact of environmental change on blue tit and great tit migration distance.
    Smallegange IM; Fiedler W; Köppen U; Geiter O; Bairlein F
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Mar; 79(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 20002861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spring temperatures influence selection on breeding date and the potential for phenological mismatch in a migratory bird.
    Bowers EK; Grindstaff JL; Soukup SS; Drilling NE; Eckerle KP; Sakaluk SK; Thompson CF
    Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2880-2891. PubMed ID: 27859132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Great tits lay increasingly smaller clutches than selected for: a study of climate- and density-related changes in reproductive traits.
    Ahola MP; Laaksonen T; Eeva T; Lehikoinen E
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1298-306. PubMed ID: 19682140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of continent-wide patterns of sexual selection in a passerine bird.
    Møller AP; Chabi Y; Cuervo JJ; De Lope F; Kilpimaa J; Kose M; Matyjasiak P; Pap PL; Saino N; Sakraoui R; Schifferli L; von Hirschheydt J
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):856-68. PubMed ID: 16739465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection on laying date is connected to breeding density in the pied flycatcher.
    Ahola MP; Laaksonen T; Eeva T; Lehikoinen E
    Oecologia; 2012 Mar; 168(3):703-10. PubMed ID: 21987266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Components of variance underlying fitness in a natural population of the great tit Parus major.
    McCleery RH; Pettifor RA; Armbruster P; Meyer K; Sheldon BC; Perrins CM
    Am Nat; 2004 Sep; 164(3):E62-72. PubMed ID: 15478083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strong artificial selection in the wild results in predicted small evolutionary change.
    Postma E; Visser J; Van Noordwijk AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1823-32. PubMed ID: 17714300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latitudinal variation in breeding time reaction norms in a passerine bird.
    Gienapp P; Väisänen RA; Brommer JE
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 20384644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why breeding time has not responded to selection for earlier breeding in a songbird population.
    Gienapp P; Postma E; Visser ME
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2381-8. PubMed ID: 17236428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting demographically sustainable rates of adaptation: can great tit breeding time keep pace with climate change?
    Gienapp P; Lof M; Reed TE; McNamara J; Verhulst S; Visser ME
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Jan; 368(1610):20120289. PubMed ID: 23209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High fitness costs of climate change-induced camouflage mismatch.
    Zimova M; Mills LS; Nowak JJ
    Ecol Lett; 2016 Mar; 19(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 26799459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.