These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620161)
1. Expressing gambling-related cognitive biases in motor behaviour: rolling dice to win prizes. Lim MS; Bowden-Jones H; Rogers RD J Gambl Stud; 2014 Sep; 30(3):625-37. PubMed ID: 23620161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive biases and decision making in gambling. Chóliz M Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 20923045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers. Nower L; Blaszczynski A J Gambl Stud; 2010 Sep; 26(3):361-72. PubMed ID: 20084433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. For Better and For Worse: Frequent Gamblers Use Dual Counterfactuals to Justify Continued Gambling. Anthony CI; Cowley E; Blaszczynski A J Gambl Stud; 2024 Jun; 40(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 37277692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Encouraging Gamblers to Think Critically Using Generalised Analytical Priming is Ineffective at Reducing Gambling Biases. Armstrong T; Rockloff M; Browne M; Blaszczynski A J Gambl Stud; 2020 Sep; 36(3):851-869. PubMed ID: 31728742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Myrseth H; Brunborg GS; Eidem M J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 20169466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The desire to gamble: the influence of outcomes on the priming effects of a gambling episode. Young MM; Wohl MJ; Matheson K; Baumann S; Anisman H J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):275-93. PubMed ID: 18330680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers. Sescousse G; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MH; Geurts DE; Ter Huurne NP; Clark L; Cools R Neuropsychopharmacology; 2016 Sep; 41(10):2614-23. PubMed ID: 27006113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Luck, come here! Automatic approach tendencies toward gambling cues in moderate- to high-risk gamblers. Boffo M; Smits R; Salmon JP; Cowie ME; de Jong DTHA; Salemink E; Collins P; Stewart SH; Wiers RW Addiction; 2018 Feb; 113(2):289-298. PubMed ID: 29055971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experiencing a significant win and its sociodemographic and motivational predictors: A comparative analysis of pure-chance gamblers from Poland and France. Lelonek-Kuleta B; Bartczuk RP; Tovar ML; Benoit E; Costes JM PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277972. PubMed ID: 36409760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On finding the C in CBT: the challenges of applying gambling-related cognitive approaches to video-gaming. Delfabbro P; King D J Gambl Stud; 2015 Mar; 31(1):315-29. PubMed ID: 25859578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prize level and debt size: impact on gambling behaviour. Crewe-Brown C; Blaszczynski A; Russell A J Gambl Stud; 2014 Sep; 30(3):639-51. PubMed ID: 23543350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers. Grant JE; Odlaug BL; Chamberlain SR; Schreiber LR Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2012 Aug; 38(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 22613186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive Characteristics of Strategic and Non-strategic Gamblers. Mouneyrac A; Lemercier C; Le Floch V; Challet-Bouju G; Moreau A; Jacques C; Giroux I J Gambl Stud; 2018 Mar; 34(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 28756501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do gamblers end gambling: longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. Xuan Z; Shaffer H J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 19247819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in different clinical phenotypes of gambling disorder: Profiles and longitudinal prediction of treatment outcomes. Mallorquí-Bagué N; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Verdejo-García A; Granero R; Fernández-Aranda F; Magaña P; Mena-Moreno T; Aymamí N; Gómez-Peña M; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mestre-Bach G; Menchón JM; Jiménez-Murcia S Eur Psychiatry; 2019 Sep; 61():9-16. PubMed ID: 31255958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beliefs About Gambling Mediate the Effect of Cognitive Style on Gambling Problems. Armstrong T; Rockloff M; Browne M; Blaszczynski A J Gambl Stud; 2020 Sep; 36(3):871-886. PubMed ID: 32215774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unclaimed Prize Information Biases Perceptions of Winning in Scratch Card Gambling. Walker AC; Stange M; Fugelsang JA; Koehler DJ; Dixon MJ J Gambl Stud; 2018 Dec; 34(4):1355-1375. PubMed ID: 29594722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Problem gambling and the circumstances facing older people : a study of gaming machine players aged 60+ in licensed clubs. Southwell J; Boreham P; Laffan W J Gambl Stud; 2008 Jun; 24(2):151-74. PubMed ID: 18219566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]