These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620357)

  • 21. Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data.
    Ratan A; Olson TL; Loughran TP; Miller W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 25879703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. RVD2: an ultra-sensitive variant detection model for low-depth heterogeneous next-generation sequencing data.
    He Y; Zhang F; Flaherty P
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2785-93. PubMed ID: 25931517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beta-Binomial Model for the Detection of Rare Mutations in Pooled Next-Generation Sequencing Experiments.
    Jakaitiene A; Avino M; Guarracino MR
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 27632638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development.
    Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
    Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the accuracy of variant calling methods using the frequency of parent-offspring genotype mismatch.
    Jasper RJ; McDonald TK; Singh P; Lu M; Rougeux C; Lind BM; Yeaman S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2524-2533. PubMed ID: 35510784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using 2k + 2 bubble searches to find single nucleotide polymorphisms in k-mer graphs.
    Younsi R; MacLean D
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 25344498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying, understanding, and correcting technical artifacts on the sex chromosomes in next-generation sequencing data.
    Webster TH; Couse M; Grande BM; Karlins E; Phung TN; Richmond PA; Whitford W; Wilson MA
    Gigascience; 2019 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 31289836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Identification in Polyploids: A Review, Example, and Recommendations.
    Clevenger J; Chavarro C; Pearl SA; Ozias-Akins P; Jackson SA
    Mol Plant; 2015 Jun; 8(6):831-46. PubMed ID: 25676455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads.
    Heller D; Vingron M
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(17):2907-2915. PubMed ID: 30668829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats.
    Tarasov A; Vilella AJ; Cuppen E; Nijman IJ; Prins P
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):2032-4. PubMed ID: 25697820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NGmerge: merging paired-end reads via novel empirically-derived models of sequencing errors.
    Gaspar JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):536. PubMed ID: 30572828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Manipulating base quality scores enables variant calling from bisulfite sequencing alignments using conventional bayesian approaches.
    Nunn A; Otto C; Fasold M; Stadler PF; Langenberger D
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):477. PubMed ID: 35764934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Isomorphic semantic mapping of variant call format (VCF2RDF).
    Penha ED; Iriabho E; Dussaq A; de Oliveira DM; Almeida JS
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):547-548. PubMed ID: 27797761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simulating Next-Generation Sequencing Datasets from Empirical Mutation and Sequencing Models.
    Stephens ZD; Hudson ME; Mainzer LS; Taschuk M; Weber MR; Iyer RK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167047. PubMed ID: 27893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. GMcloser: closing gaps in assemblies accurately with a likelihood-based selection of contig or long-read alignments.
    Kosugi S; Hirakawa H; Tabata S
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(23):3733-41. PubMed ID: 26261222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. VarSim: a high-fidelity simulation and validation framework for high-throughput genome sequencing with cancer applications.
    Mu JC; Mohiyuddin M; Li J; Bani Asadi N; Gerstein MB; Abyzov A; Wong WH; Lam HY
    Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 31(9):1469-71. PubMed ID: 25524895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the necessity of PCR duplicate removal from next-generation sequencing data and a comparison of approaches.
    Ebbert MT; Wadsworth ME; Staley LA; Hoyt KL; Pickett B; Miller J; Duce J; ; Kauwe JS; Ridge PG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):239. PubMed ID: 27454357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.