BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620360)

  • 1. Shimmer: detection of genetic alterations in tumors using next-generation sequence data.
    Hansen NF; Gartner JJ; Mei L; Samuels Y; Mullikin JC
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 29(12):1498-503. PubMed ID: 23620360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating somatic tumor mutation detection without matched normal samples.
    Teer JK; Zhang Y; Chen L; Welsh EA; Cress WD; Eschrich SA; Berglund AE
    Hum Genomics; 2017 Sep; 11(1):22. PubMed ID: 28870239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MixClone: a mixture model for inferring tumor subclonal populations.
    Li Y; Xie X
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. PubMed ID: 25707430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimized pipeline of MuTect and GATK tools to improve the detection of somatic single nucleotide polymorphisms in whole-exome sequencing data.
    do Valle ÍF; Giampieri E; Simonetti G; Padella A; Manfrini M; Ferrari A; Papayannidis C; Zironi I; Garonzi M; Bernardi S; Delledonne M; Martinelli G; Remondini D; Castellani G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(Suppl 12):341. PubMed ID: 28185561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AbsCN-seq: a statistical method to estimate tumor purity, ploidy and absolute copy numbers from next-generation sequencing data.
    Bao L; Pu M; Messer K
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 30(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 24389661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ISOWN: accurate somatic mutation identification in the absence of normal tissue controls.
    Kalatskaya I; Trinh QM; Spears M; McPherson JD; Bartlett JMS; Stein L
    Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):59. PubMed ID: 28659176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CloneCNA: detecting subclonal somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-exome sequencing data.
    Yu Z; Li A; Wang M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17():310. PubMed ID: 27538789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A three-caller pipeline for variant analysis of cancer whole-exome sequencing data.
    Liu ZK; Shang YK; Chen ZN; Bian H
    Mol Med Rep; 2017 May; 15(5):2489-2494. PubMed ID: 28447726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mutascope: sensitive detection of somatic mutations from deep amplicon sequencing.
    Yost SE; Alakus H; Matsui H; Schwab RB; Jepsen K; Frazer KA; Harismendy O
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Aug; 29(15):1908-9. PubMed ID: 23712659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PhyloWGS: reconstructing subclonal composition and evolution from whole-genome sequencing of tumors.
    Deshwar AG; Vembu S; Yung CK; Jang GH; Stein L; Morris Q
    Genome Biol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):35. PubMed ID: 25786235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MuSE: accounting for tumor heterogeneity using a sample-specific error model improves sensitivity and specificity in mutation calling from sequencing data.
    Fan Y; Xi L; Hughes DS; Zhang J; Zhang J; Futreal PA; Wheeler DA; Wang W
    Genome Biol; 2016 Aug; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 27557938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing.
    Koboldt DC; Zhang Q; Larson DE; Shen D; McLellan MD; Lin L; Miller CA; Mardis ER; Ding L; Wilson RK
    Genome Res; 2012 Mar; 22(3):568-76. PubMed ID: 22300766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurity: accurate tumor purity and ploidy inference from tumor-normal WGS data by jointly modelling somatic copy number alterations and heterozygous germline single-nucleotide-variants.
    Luo Z; Fan X; Su Y; Huang YS
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 34(12):2004-2011. PubMed ID: 29385401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying tumor heterogeneity in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data.
    Oesper L; Satas G; Raphael BJ
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3532-40. PubMed ID: 25297070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams.
    Kim SY; Speed TP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jun; 14():189. PubMed ID: 23758877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing.
    Niknafs N; Beleva-Guthrie V; Naiman DQ; Karchin R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004416. PubMed ID: 26436540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A web-based interactive framework to assist in the prioritization of disease candidate genes in whole-exome sequencing studies.
    Alemán A; Garcia-Garcia F; Salavert F; Medina I; Dopazo J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W88-93. PubMed ID: 24803668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer Gene Discovery by Network Analysis of Somatic Mutations Using the MUFFINN Server.
    Han H; Lehner B; Lee I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1907():37-50. PubMed ID: 30542989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioinformatics Analysis of Whole Exome Sequencing Data.
    Ulintz PJ; Wu W; Gates CM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1881():277-318. PubMed ID: 30350213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.