These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620506)

  • 1. Use of ulipristal acetate, levonorgestrel and the copper-intrauterine device for emergency contraception following the introduction of new FSRH guidelines.
    Baird AS
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2013 Oct; 39(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 23620506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study.
    Baird AS; Trussell J; Webb A
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2015 Apr; 41(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 24869461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency contraception: A multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.
    Batur P; Cleland K; McNamara M; Wu J; Pickle S;
    Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26363429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An emergency contraception algorithm based on risk assessment: changes in clinicians' practice and patients' choices.
    McKay RJ; Gilbert L
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2013 Jul; 39(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 23430815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ulipristal acetate: review of the efficacy and safety of a newly approved agent for emergency contraception.
    Richardson AR; Maltz FN
    Clin Ther; 2012 Jan; 34(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 22154199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study.
    Envall N; Groes Kofoed N; Kopp-Kallner H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Aug; 95(8):887-93. PubMed ID: 27109900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EC4U: results from a pilot project integrating the copper IUC into emergency contraceptive care.
    Kohn JE; Nucatola DL
    Contraception; 2016 Jul; 94(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 26877186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Update on emergency contraception.
    Fok WK; Blumenthal PD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 28(6):522-529. PubMed ID: 27676405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergency contraception.
    Gemzell-Danielsson K; Rabe T; Cheng L
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Mar; 29 Suppl 1():1-14. PubMed ID: 23437846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Emergency contraception: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines].
    Hamdaoui N; Cardinale C; Agostini A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):799-805. PubMed ID: 30389544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emergency contraception: a review.
    Corbelli J; Bimla Schwarz E
    Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):551-64. PubMed ID: 25313947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.
    Bellows BK; Tak CR; Sanders JN; Turok DK; Schwarz EB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):508.e1-508.e9. PubMed ID: 29409847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Emergency contraception.
    Salcedo J; Cleland K; Bartz D; Thompson I
    Contraception; 2023 May; 121():109958. PubMed ID: 36693445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The rationale for use of Ulipristal Acetate as first line in emergency contraception: biological and clinical evidence.
    Glasier A
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Oct; 30(10):688-90. PubMed ID: 25133564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Emergency contraception : practical guideline].
    Béliard A; Chabbert-Buffet N; Pintiaux A
    Rev Med Liege; 2020 Dec; 75(12):770-774. PubMed ID: 33331699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevention of unintended pregnancies by using emergency contraception: the differences between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate. A theoretical model using data from a survey on the use of emergency contraception in Spain, 2017.
    Lete I; Doval JL; Pérez-Campos E; Alonso MJ; Sellers G; Sánchez-Borrego R
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019 Jul; 35(7):582-585. PubMed ID: 30614295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.
    Glasier AF; Cameron ST; Fine PM; Logan SJ; Casale W; Van Horn J; Sogor L; Blithe DL; Scherrer B; Mathe H; Jaspart A; Ulmann A; Gainer E
    Lancet; 2010 Feb; 375(9714):555-62. PubMed ID: 20116841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel emergency contraception among current oral contraceptive users: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Bullard KA; Edelman AB; Williams SM; Rodriguez MI
    Contraception; 2019 Sep; 100(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 31102631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency contraception: clinical outcomes.
    Glasier A
    Contraception; 2013 Mar; 87(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 23040128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Emergency contraception: efficacy difference between levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate depending on the follicular size at the time of an unprotected sexual intercourse].
    Jamin C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 25703406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.