215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23620547)
1. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.
Fernbach PM; Rogers T; Fox CR; Sloman SA
Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23620547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is political extremism supported by an illusion of understanding?
Sloman SA; Vives ML
Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105146. PubMed ID: 35533417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asking People to Explain Complex Policies Does Not Increase Political Moderation: Three Preregistered Failures to Closely Replicate Fernbach, Rogers, Fox, and Sloman's (2013) Findings.
Crawford JT; Ruscio J
Psychol Sci; 2021 Apr; 32(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 33667138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the origins of political views: biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults.
Hussak LJ; Cimpian A
Dev Sci; 2018 May; 21(3):e12567. PubMed ID: 28722292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambivalent attitudes promote support for extreme political actions.
Siev JJ; Petty RE
Sci Adv; 2024 Jun; 10(24):eadn2965. PubMed ID: 38865461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority.
Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP
Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Missing the trees for the forest: a construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth.
Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM; Zemla JC
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):436-51. PubMed ID: 20658836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflecting on explanatory ability: A mechanism for detecting gaps in causal knowledge.
Johnson DR; Murphy MP; Messer RM
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 May; 145(5):573-588. PubMed ID: 26999047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extremism, knowledge, and overconfidence in the covid-19 restriction times.
Hatori T; Bhandary NP
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1295807. PubMed ID: 38362243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience.
Matute H; Yarritu I; Vadillo MA
Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):392-405. PubMed ID: 21751996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between maternal attitudes and young people's attitudes toward children's rights.
Day DM; Peterson-Badali M; Ruck MD
J Adolesc; 2006 Apr; 29(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 15992920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions.
Bjork RA; Dunlosky J; Kornell N
Annu Rev Psychol; 2013; 64():417-44. PubMed ID: 23020639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When good evidence goes bad: the weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making.
Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 21345428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limits to evidence-based health policymaking: policy hurdles to structural HIV prevention in Tanzania.
Hunsmann M
Soc Sci Med; 2012 May; 74(10):1477-85. PubMed ID: 22445763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of socioeconomic status: how socioeconomic status may influence political attitudes and engagement.
Brown-Iannuzzi JL; Lundberg KB; McKee S
Curr Opin Psychol; 2017 Dec; 18():11-14. PubMed ID: 29221505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective status shapes political preferences.
Brown-Iannuzzi JL; Lundberg KB; Kay AC; Payne BK
Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 25416138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The objectivity illusion and voter polarization in the 2016 presidential election.
Schwalbe MC; Cohen GL; Ross LD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21218-21229. PubMed ID: 32817537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
