BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23621543)

  • 1. Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Huizar JF; Kaszala K; Koneru JN; Thacker LR; Ellenbogen KA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1008-14. PubMed ID: 23621543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
    Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
    Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preventing phrenic nerve stimulation by a patch insulation in an intact swine heart model.
    Huang JL; Lin YJ; Hung YW; Hsieh YC; Cheng CM; Wang KY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102608. PubMed ID: 25033271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of bipolar electrode spacing on phrenic nerve stimulation and left ventricular pacing thresholds: an acute canine study.
    Biffi M; Foerster L; Eastman W; Eggen M; Grenz NA; Sommer J; De Santo T; Haddad T; Varbaro A; Yang Z
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 5(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 22787012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Moubarak G; Bouzeman A; Ollitrault J; Anselme F; Cazeau S
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 24934757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
    Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pacing configurations, body mass index, and position of coronary sinus lead on frequency of phrenic nerve stimulation and pacing thresholds under cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Seifert M; Schau T; Moeller V; Neuss M; Meyhoefer J; Butter C
    Europace; 2010 Jul; 12(7):961-7. PubMed ID: 20444725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-spaced dipole for managing phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with CRT: the "phrenic nerve mapping and stimulation EP" catheter study.
    Biffi M; Zanon F; Bertaglia E; Padeletti L; Varbaro A; De Santo T; Boriani G; Yang Z;
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jan; 10(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.
    Goetze S; Defaye P; Bauer A; Merkel M; Bizeau O; Treusch S; Contzen K; Juenger C; Winter J;
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23868567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparity in left ventricular stimulation among different pacing configurations in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Huizar JF; Kaszala K; Koneru J; Kowalski M; Thacker LR; Wood MA; Ellenbogen KA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Feb; 5(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 22199009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular pacing with long pulse duration can avoid phrenic nerve stimulation.
    Oh S; Kim WY; Kim HC; Oh IY; Choi EK
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1637-40. PubMed ID: 21699844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of electronic repositioning on left ventricular pacing and phrenic nerve stimulation.
    Champagne J; Healey JS; Krahn AD; Philippon F; Gurevitz O; Swearingen A; Glikson M;
    Europace; 2011 Mar; 13(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 21273196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long pacing pulses reduce phrenic nerve stimulation in left ventricular pacing.
    Hjortshøj S; Heath F; Haugland M; Eschen O; Thøgersen AM; Riahi S; Toft E; Struijk JJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 May; 25(5):485-490. PubMed ID: 24329999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Programmable multiple pacing configurations help to overcome high left ventricular pacing thresholds and avoid phrenic nerve stimulation.
    Gurevitz O; Nof E; Carasso S; Luria D; Bar-Lev D; Tanami N; Eldar M; Glikson M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Dec; 28(12):1255-9. PubMed ID: 16403156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.
    Ciconte G; Ćalović Ž; McSpadden LC; Ryu K; Mangual J; Caporaso I; Baldi M; Saviano M; Cuko A; Vitale R; Conti M; Giannelli L; Vicedomini G; Santinelli V; Pappone C
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Mar; 54(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30483980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a quadripolar left ventricular lead to achieve successful implantation in patients with previous failed attempts at cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Bostock J; Rosenthal E; Rinaldi CA
    Europace; 2011 Jul; 13(7):992-6. PubMed ID: 21343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site.
    Biffi M; Exner DV; Crossley GH; Ramza B; Coutu B; Tomassoni G; Kranig W; Li S; Kristiansen N; Voss F
    Europace; 2013 Jan; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 22848075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
    Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes.
    Forleo GB; Della Rocca DG; Papavasileiou LP; Molfetta AD; Santini L; Romeo F
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20887804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Use of a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Increases Successful Implantation Rates in Patients with Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and/or High Pacing Thresholds Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy with Conventional Bipolar Leads.
    Ohlow MA; Lauer B; Brunelli M; Daralammouri Y; Geller C
    Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2013 Mar; 13(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 23573059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.