169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23621586)
1. TRAPP: a tool for analysis of transient binding pockets in proteins.
Kokh DB; Richter S; Henrich S; Czodrowski P; Rippmann F; Wade RC
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 May; 53(5):1235-52. PubMed ID: 23621586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TRAPP webserver: predicting protein binding site flexibility and detecting transient binding pockets.
Stank A; Kokh DB; Horn M; Sizikova E; Neil R; Panecka J; Richter S; Wade RC
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jul; 45(W1):W325-W330. PubMed ID: 28431137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Druggability Assessment in TRAPP Using Machine Learning Approaches.
Yuan JH; Han SB; Richter S; Wade RC; Kokh DB
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1685-1699. PubMed ID: 32105476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A molecular dynamics ensemble-based approach for the mapping of druggable binding sites.
Ivetac A; McCammon JA
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():3-12. PubMed ID: 22183526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pocket-space maps to identify novel binding-site conformations in proteins.
Craig IR; Pfleger C; Gohlke H; Essex JW; Spiegel K
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2666-79. PubMed ID: 21910474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein Binding Pocket Dynamics.
Stank A; Kokh DB; Fuller JC; Wade RC
Acc Chem Res; 2016 May; 49(5):809-15. PubMed ID: 27110726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DrugPred: a structure-based approach to predict protein druggability developed using an extensive nonredundant data set.
Krasowski A; Muthas D; Sarkar A; Schmitt S; Brenk R
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2829-42. PubMed ID: 21995295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets.
Volkamer A; Griewel A; Grombacher T; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2041-52. PubMed ID: 20945875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility.
Wagner JR; Sørensen J; Hensley N; Wong C; Zhu C; Perison T; Amaro RE
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Sep; 13(9):4584-4592. PubMed ID: 28800393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protein side-chain rearrangement in regions of point mutations.
Eyal E; Najmanovich R; Edelman M; Sobolev V
Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(2):272-82. PubMed ID: 12486721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perturbation Approaches for Exploring Protein Binding Site Flexibility to Predict Transient Binding Pockets.
Kokh DB; Czodrowski P; Rippmann F; Wade RC
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4100-13. PubMed ID: 27399277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conformational analysis of long spacers in PROSITE patterns.
Lin KY; Wright J; Lim C
J Mol Biol; 2000 Jun; 299(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 10860757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and druggability prediction of protein-ligand binding sites from pharmacophore-annotated cavity shapes.
Desaphy J; Azdimousa K; Kellenberger E; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2287-99. PubMed ID: 22834646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-based computational analysis of protein binding sites for function and druggability prediction.
Nisius B; Sha F; Gohlke H
J Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 159(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 22197384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures.
Glaser F; Morris RJ; Najmanovich RJ; Laskowski RA; Thornton JM
Proteins; 2006 Feb; 62(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 16304646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geometry-based sampling of conformational transitions in proteins.
Seeliger D; Haas J; de Groot BL
Structure; 2007 Nov; 15(11):1482-92. PubMed ID: 17997973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
Henrich S; Salo-Ahen OM; Huang B; Rippmann FF; Cruciani G; Wade RC
J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
