These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23621586)

  • 21. RapidRMSD: rapid determination of RMSDs corresponding to motions of flexible molecules.
    Neveu E; Popov P; Hoffmann A; Migliosi A; Besseron X; Danoy G; Bouvry P; Grudinin S
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(16):2757-2765. PubMed ID: 29554205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT.
    Fiorucci S; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3131-9. PubMed ID: 20715290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SH2 binding site comparison: a new application of the SURFCOMP method.
    Hofbauer C; Aszódi A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(2):414-21. PubMed ID: 15807507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Merging chemical and biological space: Structural mapping of enzyme binding pocket space.
    Weskamp N; Hüllermeier E; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2009 Aug; 76(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 19173307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins.
    Tinberg CE; Khare SD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():363-373. PubMed ID: 27914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of multiscale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology.
    Kawabata T
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1195-211. PubMed ID: 19938154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Prediction of Druggable Binding Sites.
    Feng T; Barakat K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():87-103. PubMed ID: 29594769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking.
    Smith GR; Sternberg MJ; Bates PA
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Apr; 347(5):1077-101. PubMed ID: 15784265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility.
    May A; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 17803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Drug-like density: a method of quantifying the "bindability" of a protein target based on a very large set of pockets and drug-like ligands from the Protein Data Bank.
    Sheridan RP; Maiorov VN; Holloway MK; Cornell WD; Gao YD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Nov; 50(11):2029-40. PubMed ID: 20977231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.
    Sun Z; Wakefield AE; Kolossvary I; Beglov D; Vajda S
    Structure; 2020 Feb; 28(2):223-235.e2. PubMed ID: 31810712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamics alignment: comparison of protein dynamics in the SCOP database.
    Tobi D
    Proteins; 2012 Apr; 80(4):1167-76. PubMed ID: 22275069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
    Davis IW; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application.
    Baroni M; Cruciani G; Sciabola S; Perruccio F; Mason JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 17381166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Molecular flexibility in protein-DNA interactions.
    Günther S; Rother K; Frömmel C
    Biosystems; 2006 Aug; 85(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 16488073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites.
    Neuvirth H; Raz R; Schreiber G
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(1):181-99. PubMed ID: 15050833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A path planning approach for computing large-amplitude motions of flexible molecules.
    Cortés J; Siméon T; Ruiz de Angulo V; Guieysse D; Remaud-Siméon M; Tran V
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i116-25. PubMed ID: 15961448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.