These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23621897)

  • 1. Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture.
    Pimentel EC; Wensch-Dorendorf M; König S; Swalve HH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):12. PubMed ID: 23621897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations.
    Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
    Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
    Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds.
    Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Venot E; Guillaume F; Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Phocas F; Boichard D; Croiseau P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 24004563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 21624176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.
    Judge MM; Purfield DC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28464096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
    Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
    Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.
    O'Brien AC; Judge MM; Fair S; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 30722011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.
    Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):6. PubMed ID: 24490796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
    Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.