These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23621897)

  • 21. Design of low density SNP chips for genotype imputation in layer chicken.
    Herry F; Hérault F; Picard Druet D; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    BMC Genet; 2018 Dec; 19(1):108. PubMed ID: 30514201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.
    Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1743-53. PubMed ID: 25045914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep.
    Raoul J; Swan AA; Elsen JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):76. PubMed ID: 29065868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genotyping, the Usefulness of Imputation to Increase SNP Density, and Imputation Methods and Tools.
    Phocas F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2467():113-138. PubMed ID: 35451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.
    Judge MM; Kearney JF; McClure MC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):949-62. PubMed ID: 27065257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimizing Low-Cost Genotyping and Imputation Strategies for Genomic Selection in Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsairidou S; Hamilton A; Robledo D; Bron JE; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Feb; 10(2):581-590. PubMed ID: 31826882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of low-density SNP panels and imputation for cost-effective genomic selection in four aquaculture species.
    Kriaridou C; Tsairidou S; Fraslin C; Gorjanc G; Looseley ME; Johnston IA; Houston RD; Robledo D
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1194266. PubMed ID: 37252666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.
    Chen L; Li C; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel F
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101544. PubMed ID: 25025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs.
    Song H; Ye S; Jiang Y; Zhang Z; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Oct; 51(1):58. PubMed ID: 31638889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods of tagSNP selection and other variables affecting imputation accuracy in swine.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Schwab C; Fix J; Van Tassell CP; Steibel JP
    BMC Genet; 2013 Feb; 14():8. PubMed ID: 23433396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.
    Xiang T; Ma P; Ostersen T; Legarra A; Christensen OF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):54. PubMed ID: 26122927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On combining reference data to improve imputation accuracy.
    Chen J; Zhang JG; Li J; Pei YF; Deng HW
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e55600. PubMed ID: 23383238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sequence imputation from low density single nucleotide polymorphism panel in a black poplar breeding population.
    Pégard M; Rogier O; Bérard A; Faivre-Rampant P; Paslier ML; Bastien C; Jorge V; Sánchez L
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):302. PubMed ID: 30999856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using family-based imputation in genome-wide association studies with large complex pedigrees: the Framingham Heart Study.
    Chen MH; Huang J; Chen WM; Larson MG; Fox CS; Vasan RS; Seshadri S; O'Donnell CJ; Yang Q
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51589. PubMed ID: 23284720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.