These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23624099)

  • 1. Sensitivity to delay is affected by magnitude of reinforcement in rats.
    Orduña V; Valencia-Torres L; Cruz G; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():18-24. PubMed ID: 23624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impulsivity and sensitivity to amount and delay of reinforcement in an animal model of ADHD.
    Orduña V
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 294():62-71. PubMed ID: 26225844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delay-specific stimuli and genotype interact to determine temporal discounting in a rapid-acquisition procedure.
    Pope DA; Newland MC; Hutsell BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):450-71. PubMed ID: 25869302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative sensitivity to reinforcer amount and delay in a self-control choice situation.
    Ito M; Oyama M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Sep; 66(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 8843691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impulsivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats: Within-subjects comparison of sensitivity to delay and to amount of reinforcement.
    Orduña V; Mercado E
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 328():178-185. PubMed ID: 28435126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reinforcement magnitude and ratio values on behaviour maintained by a cyclic ratio schedule of reinforcement.
    Leslie JC; Boyle C; Shaw D
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):289-308. PubMed ID: 11131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of initial-link duration on preference and resistance to change in concurrent-chains schedules.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 19429215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.
    Anderson KG; Velkey AJ; Woolverton WL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):319-26. PubMed ID: 12373433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.