These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23624171)

  • 21. Co-speech gestures influence neural activity in brain regions associated with processing semantic information.
    Dick AS; Goldin-Meadow S; Hasson U; Skipper JI; Small SL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Nov; 30(11):3509-26. PubMed ID: 19384890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
    Humphries C; Binder JR; Medler DA; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):924-32. PubMed ID: 17500009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.
    Kaufeld G; Bosker HR; Ten Oever S; Alday PM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 40(49):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 33097640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Alphabet-Supplemented Speech on Brain Activity of Listeners: An fMRI Study.
    Fercho K; Baugh LA; Hanson EK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 58(5):1452-63. PubMed ID: 26254449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English.
    Behrman A; Akhund A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1567-78. PubMed ID: 23882007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatiotemporal convergence of semantic processing in reading and speech perception.
    Vartiainen J; Parviainen T; Salmelin R
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 29(29):9271-80. PubMed ID: 19625517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preschoolers' brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension.
    Wu CY; Vissiennon K; Friederici AD; Brauer J
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 126():256-66. PubMed ID: 26497266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physical and perceptual factors shape the neural mechanisms that integrate audiovisual signals in speech comprehension.
    Lee H; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 31(31):11338-50. PubMed ID: 21813693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes.
    Friederici AD; Rüschemeyer SA; Hahne A; Fiebach CJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Feb; 13(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12507948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictive Brain Mechanisms in Sound-to-Meaning Mapping during Speech Processing.
    Lyu B; Ge J; Niu Z; Tan LH; Gao JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(42):10813-10822. PubMed ID: 27798136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The language skeleton after dissecting meaning: A functional segregation within Broca's Area.
    Goucha T; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():294-302. PubMed ID: 25871627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise.
    Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple Regions of a Cortical Network Commonly Encode the Meaning of Words in Multiple Grammatical Positions of Read Sentences.
    Anderson AJ; Lalor EC; Lin F; Binder JR; Fernandino L; Humphries CJ; Conant LL; Raizada RDS; Grimm S; Wang X
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Jun; 29(6):2396-2411. PubMed ID: 29771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Previous exposure to intact speech increases intelligibility of its digitally degraded counterpart as a function of stimulus complexity.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Alho J; Alku P; Jokinen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():131-143. PubMed ID: 26477651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: evidence from Wada procedures.
    Hickok G; Okada K; Barr W; Pa J; Rogalsky C; Donnelly K; Barde L; Grant A
    Brain Lang; 2008 Dec; 107(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18976806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhancing speech intelligibility: interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker.
    Van Engen KJ; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1908-18. PubMed ID: 24687206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring the roles of spectral detail and intonation contour in speech intelligibility: an FMRI study.
    Kyong JS; Scott SK; Rosen S; Howe TB; Agnew ZK; McGettigan C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1748-63. PubMed ID: 24568205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
    Wijayasiri P; Hartley DEH; Wiggins IM
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():55-67. PubMed ID: 28571617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.