These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23627747)
1. The hobgoblin of consistency: algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance. Williams EF; Dunning D; Kruger J J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 104(6):976-94. PubMed ID: 23627747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deliberation's blindsight: how cognitive load can improve judgments. Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Rieskamp J Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):869-79. PubMed ID: 23575598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of judgment scale to the unskilled-and-unaware phenomenon: how evaluating others can exaggerate over- (and under-) confidence. Hartwig MK; Dunlosky J Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 23846414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Ackerman R J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1349-68. PubMed ID: 24364687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Koriat A Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):80-113. PubMed ID: 22022833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: a dual-process perspective on overconfidence. Mata A; Ferreira MB; Sherman SJ J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Sep; 105(3):353-73. PubMed ID: 23895268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model. Koriat A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):117-39. PubMed ID: 21299320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Lucas BJ; Nordgren LF J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Aug; 109(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 26191961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Count me in! On the automaticity of numerosity processing. Naparstek S; Henik A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1053-9. PubMed ID: 20565221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cohen AL; Staub A Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the ability of people with intellectual disabilities to 'weigh up' information in two tests of financial reasoning. Willner P; Bailey R; Parry R; Dymond S J Intellect Disabil Res; 2010 Apr; 54(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 20202072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ventromedial frontal lobe damage disrupts the accuracy, but not the speed, of value-based preference judgments. Henri-Bhargava A; Simioni A; Fellows LK Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1536-42. PubMed ID: 22433288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Relationship between recognition judgments and confidence ratings for repeated test items]. Takahashi A Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Dec; 79(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 19172913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The construction of categorization judgments: using subjective confidence and response latency to test a distributed model. Koriat A; Sorka H Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():21-38. PubMed ID: 25460376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When are two heads better than one and why? Koriat A Science; 2012 Apr; 336(6079):360-2. PubMed ID: 22517862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aligning confidence with accuracy: revisiting the role of feedback. González-Vallejo C; Bonham A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):221-39. PubMed ID: 16962061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]