399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23628790)
1. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
Janssen T
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Janssen T; Niedermeyer HP; Arnold W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 17065826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Automated hearing threshold estimation in newborns using extrapolated DPOAE input/output functions].
Janssen T; Klein A; Gehr DD
HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):971-80. PubMed ID: 14647926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
Gehr DD; Janssen T; Michaelis CE; Deingruber K; Lamm K
Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term changes of hearing and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Park H; Lee Y; Park M; Kim J; Na B; Shin J
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Aug; 31(6):862-6. PubMed ID: 20601916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Otoacoustic emissions--a step closer to understanding cochlear function].
Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D; Dankuc D
Med Pregl; 2001; 54(11-12):539-42. PubMed ID: 11921687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study.
Job A; Raynal M; Kossowski M; Studler M; Ghernaouti C; Baffioni-Venturi A; Roux A; Darolles C; Guelorget A
Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 19249340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
Xu ZM; Li J; Hu TZ; Sun JH; Shen XM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product emissions in disorders of middle ear ventilation].
Schmuziger N; Hauser R; Probst R
HNO; 1996 Jun; 44(6):319-23. PubMed ID: 8767128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Otoacoustic emissions in children with normal ears, middle ear dysfunction, and ventilating tubes.
Owens JJ; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
Am J Otol; 1993 Jan; 14(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8424474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Otoacoustic emissions. A futuristic objective hearing test].
Plinkert PK
Fortschr Med; 1993 Oct; 111(29):453-6. PubMed ID: 8258421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit.
Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
