340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23628893)
1. Intravesical electrostimulation versus sacral neuromodulation for incomplete spinal cord patients suffering from neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention.
Lombardi G; Musco S; Celso M; Ierardi A; Nelli F; Del Corso F; Del Popolo G
Spinal Cord; 2013 Jul; 51(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 23628893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention in incomplete spinal cord patients: a ten-year follow-up single-centre experience.
Lombardi G; Musco S; Celso M; Del Corso F; Del Popolo G
Spinal Cord; 2014 Mar; 52(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 24394604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical efficacy of intravesical electrostimulation on incomplete spinal cord patients suffering from chronic neurogenic non-obstructive retention: a 15-year single centre retrospective study.
Lombardi G; Celso M; Mencarini M; Nelli F; Del Popolo G
Spinal Cord; 2013 Mar; 51(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 23147136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Wöllner J; Krebs J; Pannek J
Spinal Cord; 2016 Feb; 54(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 26215913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical concomitant benefits on pelvic floor dysfunctions after sacral neuromodulation in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Lombardi G; Nelli F; Mencarini M; Del Popolo G
Spinal Cord; 2011 May; 49(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 21283086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation in incomplete spinal cord injured patients suffering from neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms.
Lombardi G; Del Popolo G
Spinal Cord; 2009 Jun; 47(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 19238164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction and impact on erectile function.
Lombardi G; Mondaini N; Giubilei G; Macchiarella A; Lecconi F; Del Popolo G
J Sex Med; 2008 Sep; 5(9):2135-40. PubMed ID: 18637993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of urodynamic tools to guide patient selection in sacral neuromodulation.
Drossaerts J; Rademakers K; van Koeveringe G; Van Kerrebroeck P
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1889-95. PubMed ID: 25680936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does intravesical electrostimulation improve neurogenic constipation? A case report.
Calabrò RS; Marullo M; Gervasi G; Marino S; Bramanti P
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):614-6. PubMed ID: 21593675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.
Amend B; Bedke J; Khalil M; Stenzl A; Sievert KD
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 22738331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of electrical stimulation of the neurogenic bladder: results of a two-year follow-up study.
Radziszewski K
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(4):867-73. PubMed ID: 23867413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new minimally invasive procedure for pudendal nerve stimulation to treat neurogenic bladder: description of the method and preliminary data.
Spinelli M; Malaguti S; Giardiello G; Lazzeri M; Tarantola J; Van Den Hombergh U
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 15977260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PNE versus 1st stage tined lead procedure: a direct comparison to select the most sensitive test method to identify patients suitable for sacral neuromodulation therapy.
Leong RK; De Wachter SG; Nieman FH; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Sep; 30(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 21404317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urodynamic findings during the filling phase in neurogenic bladder patients with or without vesicoureteral reflux who have undergone sacral neuromodulation.
Chen G; Liao L; Wang Y; Ying X
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1410-1416. PubMed ID: 32282088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Protocol for a randomized clinical trial investigating early sacral nerve stimulation as an adjunct to standard neurogenic bladder management following acute spinal cord injury.
Redshaw JD; Lenherr SM; Elliott SP; Stoffel JT; Rosenbluth JP; Presson AP; Myers JB;
BMC Urol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 30157824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of intravesical electrical stimulation therapy on urodynamic patterns for children with spina bifida: a 10-year experience.
Choi EK; Hong CH; Kim MJ; Im YJ; Jung HJ; Han SW
J Pediatr Urol; 2013 Dec; 9(6 Pt A):798-803. PubMed ID: 23177928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sacral neuromodulation in diabetic patients: success and complications in the treatment of voiding dysfunction.
Daniels DH; Powell CR; Braasch MR; Kreder KJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Apr; 29(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 19760757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sacral neuromodulation outcomes in male patients with chronic urinary retention.
Saber-Khalaf M; Abtahi B; Gonzales G; Helal M; Elneil S
Neuromodulation; 2015 Jun; 18(4):329-34; discussion 334. PubMed ID: 25655708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary retention: long-term efficacy and durability.
White WM; Dobmeyer-Dittrich C; Klein FA; Wallace LS
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 18242368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Value of Ambulatory Urodynamics in the Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Sacral Neuromodulation.
Drossaerts J; Rademakers KLJ; Rahnama'i SM; Marcelissen T; Van Kerrebroeck P; van Koeveringe G
Urol Int; 2019; 102(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 30612126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
