These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23630482)

  • 1. The emotional attentional blink: what we know so far.
    McHugo M; Olatunji BO; Zald DH
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():151. PubMed ID: 23630482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Swami AL; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1034-1053. PubMed ID: 36918514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional induced attentional blink in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Olatunji BO
    J Affect Disord; 2021 Mar; 283():101-107. PubMed ID: 33535107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The emotional attentional blink is robust to divided attention.
    Keefe JM; Sy JL; Tong F; Zald DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):205-216. PubMed ID: 30291553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaching back: the relative strength of the retroactive emotional attentional blink.
    Ní Choisdealbha Á; Piech RM; Fuller JK; Zald DH
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():43645. PubMed ID: 28255172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crisis-related stimuli do not increase the emotional attentional blink in a general university student population.
    Santacroce LA; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jan; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 38191858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Emotional distractor images disrupt target processing in a graded manner": Correction.
    Keefe JM; Zald DH
    Emotion; 2022 Aug; 22(5):981. PubMed ID: 35617262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional distractor images disrupt target processing in a graded manner.
    Keefe JM; Zald DH
    Emotion; 2022 Aug; 22(5):971-981. PubMed ID: 32852964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2741-2761. PubMed ID: 35701659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Emotional Attentional Blink as a Measure of Patriotism.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Gavilán JM; Moreno Sánchez M; Haro J
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23():e30. PubMed ID: 32744218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of emotions on temporal attention.
    Mishra MV; Ray SB; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 236():287-309. PubMed ID: 29157417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barking up the wrong tree in attentional bias modification? Comparing the sensitivity of four tasks to attentional biases.
    Sigurjónsdóttir Ó; Sigurðardóttir S; Björnsson AS; Kristjánsson Á
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Sep; 48():9-16. PubMed ID: 25665514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PTSD symptom severity is associated with increased recruitment of top-down attentional control in a trauma-exposed sample.
    White SF; Costanzo ME; Blair JR; Roy MJ
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 7():19-27. PubMed ID: 25610763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring Biases of Visual Attention: A Comparison of Four Tasks.
    Sigurjónsdóttir Ó; Bjornsson AS; Wessmann ID; Kristjánsson Á
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2020 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 31935867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Attention Control on Implicit and Explicit Emotion Processing of Face and Body: Evidence From Flanker and Same-or-Different Paradigms.
    Oldrati V; Bardoni A; Poggi G; Urgesi C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2971. PubMed ID: 32038372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaired emotional biases in visual attention after bilateral amygdala lesion.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Moyne M; Saj A; Guex R; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107292. PubMed ID: 31811846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception: evidence from two temporal attention tasks.
    Guilbert D; Most SB; Curby KM
    Cogn Emot; 2020 May; 34(3):450-461. PubMed ID: 31282266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing a goal-driven account of involuntary attentional capture by threat.
    Brown CRH; Berggren N; Forster S
    Emotion; 2020 Jun; 20(4):572-589. PubMed ID: 30869941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Carlos BJ; Petro N; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):1971-1991. PubMed ID: 33754297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.