These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631551)

  • 1. Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing.
    Batterink L; Neville H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 25(6):936-51. PubMed ID: 23631551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns.
    Morgan-Short K; Steinhauer K; Sanz C; Ullman MT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 21861686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERPs recorded during early second language exposure predict syntactic learning.
    Batterink L; Neville HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 26(9):2005-20. PubMed ID: 24666165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking Syntactic Conflict between Languages over the Course of L2 Acquisition: A Cross-sectional Event-related Potential Study.
    Mickan A; Lemhöfer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):822-846. PubMed ID: 31933431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How L2 Learners Process Different Means of Time Encoding in a Tenseless Language: An ERP Study of Mandarin.
    Hao Y; Duan X; Zha S; Xu T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Jul; 53(4):60. PubMed ID: 38980515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERPs show that classroom-instructed late second language learners rely on the same prosodic cues in syntactic parsing as native speakers.
    Nickels S; Opitz B; Steinhauer K
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Dec; 557 Pt B():107-11. PubMed ID: 24141083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Rossi S; Gugler MF; Friederici AD; Hahne A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 18(12):2030-48. PubMed ID: 17129189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners.
    Bowden HW; Steinhauer K; Sanz C; Ullman MT
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2492-511. PubMed ID: 24051003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using event-related potentials to track morphosyntactic development in second language learners: The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish.
    Alemán Bañón J; Fiorentino R; Gabriele A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200791. PubMed ID: 30052686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners.
    White EJ; Genesee F; Steinhauer K
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52318. PubMed ID: 23300641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender agreement violations modulate beta oscillatory dynamics during sentence comprehension: A comparison of second language learners and native speakers.
    Lewis AG; Lemhӧfer K; Schoffelen JM; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():254-272. PubMed ID: 27350390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners.
    Dowens MG; Vergara M; Barber HA; Carreiras M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1870-87. PubMed ID: 19580390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early neurophysiological indices of second language morphosyntax learning.
    Hanna J; Shtyrov Y; Williams J; Pulvermüller F
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Feb; 82():18-30. PubMed ID: 26752451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs.
    Mueller JL; Hahne A; Fujii Y; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1229-44. PubMed ID: 16197680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivation Among Pre-intermediate Iranian Language Learners: From Explicit Knowledge Toward Implicit Syntactic Development.
    Rafiee Fazel A; Latifi M; Moini MR
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Aug; 47(4):931-945. PubMed ID: 29427070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Second language processing shows increased native-like neural responses after months of no exposure.
    Morgan-Short K; Finger I; Grey S; Ullman MT
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32974. PubMed ID: 22470434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "semantic P600" in second language processing: When syntax conflicts with semantics.
    Zheng X; Lemhöfer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():131-147. PubMed ID: 30790583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Input Training Matters in L2 Syntactic Representation Entrenchment: Evidence from a Follow-Up ERP Study.
    Deng T; Chen B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):729-745. PubMed ID: 30684118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners.
    Mueller JL; Hirotani M; Friederici AD
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 8():18. PubMed ID: 17331265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.