298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631968)
1. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Hodges RJ; Atchison KA; White SC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 23631968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Merrett SJ; Drage NA; Durning P
J Orthod; 2009 Sep; 36(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 19741183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution.
Dudic A; Giannopoulou C; Leuzinger M; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 19361727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional assessment of impacted canines and root resorption using cone beam computed tomography.
Oberoi S; Knueppel S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Feb; 113(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 22677744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography.
Katheria BC; Kau CH; Tate R; Chen JW; English J; Bouquot J
Pediatr Dent; 2010; 32(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 20836949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam CT in orthodontics: the current picture.
Makdissi J
Int Orthod; 2013 Mar; 11(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 23375864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam computed tomography and the orthosurgical management of impacted teeth.
Becker A; Chaushu S; Casap-Caspi N
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():14S-8S. PubMed ID: 20884935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam computed tomography--current understanding and evidence for its orthodontic applications?
Noar JH; Pabari S
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23524542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography.
Ee J; Fayad MI; Johnson BR
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):910-6. PubMed ID: 24935534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use.
Kapila SD; Nervina JM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140282. PubMed ID: 25358833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone beam computed tomography in evaluations of some side effects of orthodontic treatment.
Lund H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (219):4-78. PubMed ID: 22338281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indications for cone beam computed tomography in children and young patients in a Turkish subpopulation.
İşman Ö; Yılmaz HH; Aktan AM; Yilmaz B
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 May; 27(3):183-190. PubMed ID: 27452447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation.
Patel S; Dawood A; Wilson R; Horner K; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2009 Sep; 42(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 19627378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
