788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631970)
1. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapy.
Herrera FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Francisconi MF; de Freitas KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e77-84. PubMed ID: 21803237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device.
Pupulim DC; Henriques JFC; Freitas KMS; Fontes FPH; Fernandes TMF
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 34219381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Pinelli Henriques Fontes F; Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):286-296. PubMed ID: 32063473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy.
Cope JB; Buschang PH; Cope DD; Parker J; Blackwood HO
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 8010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
Weiland FJ; Ingervall B; Bantleon HP; Droacht H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9228837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
