788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631970)
41. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
Johnson BE
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane.
Bassarelli T; Franchi L; Defraia E; Melsen B
Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):775-81. PubMed ID: 26927020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report.
Herrera-Sanches FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Neves LS; de Lima KJ; Henriques RP; Pieri LV
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):22-9. PubMed ID: 23916428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients.
Schiavon Gandini MR; Gandini LG; Da Rosa Martins JC; Del Santo M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):531-8; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 11343026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence.
Nalbantgil D; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Fulya I
Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 15898385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with three types of fixed functional appliances.
Brito DBA; Henriques JFC; Fiedler CF; Janson G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(5):30-39. PubMed ID: 31721944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Class II malocclusion treatment with the Herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak.
Alvares JC; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM; Angheben CZ
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(5):38-45. PubMed ID: 24352386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
Firouz M; Zernik J; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 1510043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
