BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631970)

  • 61. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.
    Dolce C; Schader RE; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16102404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal Class II individuals.
    Ramos DS; de Lima EM
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15747815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Treatment timing for functional jaw orthopaedics followed by fixed appliances: a controlled long-term study.
    Pavoni C; Lombardo EC; Lione R; Faltin K; McNamara JA; Cozza P; Franchi L
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):430-436. PubMed ID: 29099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Bilbo EE; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Allareddy V; Holton N; Thames AM; Otsby MS; Southard TE
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
    Seçkin O; Surucu R
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparative evaluation of micro-implant and headgear anchorage used with a pre-adjusted appliance system.
    Ma J; Wang L; Zhang W; Chen W; Zhao C; Smales RJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 18540016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial.
    Tulloch JF; Phillips C; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):62-72, quiz 73-4. PubMed ID: 9457020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance.
    Janson GR; Toruño JL; Martins DR; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 12831221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
    Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.