788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23631970)
81. Skeletal, dental, and functional effects of headgear-activator therapy on Class II malocclusion in Japanese: a clinical case report.
Deguchi T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 1877554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination.
Altenburger E; Ingervall B
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 9753820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study.
Cura N; Sarac M; Oztürk Y; Sürmeli N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jul; 110(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 8686676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Correction of severe class II skeletal discrepancy with fixed twin block and high pull headgear--a case report.
Patel D; Parekh H; Gupta B; Purl T
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 25745711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Martina R; Cioffi I; Galeotti A; Tagliaferri R; Cimino R; Michelotti A; Valletta R; Farella M; Paduano S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 23323608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances.
Buongiorno M; Iacopetti F; Beretta M; Lanteri C; Defraia E
Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 23260532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.
Spalj S; Mroz Tranesen K; Birkeland K; Katic V; Pavlic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4861924. PubMed ID: 28203569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study.
Abbing A; Koretsi V; Kalavritinos M; Schröder T; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100863. PubMed ID: 38428369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
Du X; Hägg U; Rabie AB
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Erverdi N; Ozkan G
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion.
Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
Prog Orthod; 2020 May; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32363550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Prospective study of dentoskeletal changes in Class II division malocclusion treatment with twin force bite corrector.
Guimarães CH; Henriques JF; Janson G; de Almeida MR; Araki J; Cançado RH; Castro R; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 22891750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator.
Inamassu-Lemes SM; Fuziy A; Costa AL; Carvalho PE; Nahás-Scocate AC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 27084865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
