BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23632153)

  • 21. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Stojadinovic A; Brooks A; Hoos A; Jaques DP; Conlon KC; Brennan MF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Jun; 196(6):954-64. PubMed ID: 12788434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling centralization of pancreatic surgery in a nationwide analysis.
    Balzano G; Guarneri G; Pecorelli N; Paiella S; Rancoita PMV; Bassi C; Falconi M
    Br J Surg; 2020 Oct; 107(11):1510-1519. PubMed ID: 32592514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgery insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer.
    Michalski CW; Weitz J; Büchler MW
    Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):526-35. PubMed ID: 17728711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical outcomes following pancreatic resection at a low-volume community hospital: do all patients need to be sent to a regional cancer center?
    Cunningham JD; O'Donnell N; Starker P
    Am J Surg; 2009 Aug; 198(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 19306974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying key outcome metrics in pancreatic surgery, and how to optimally achieve them.
    Bassi C; Andrianello S
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):178-181. PubMed ID: 28110832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery.
    Osborne NH; Ghaferi AA; Nicholas LH; Dimick JB; Mph M
    Arch Surg; 2011 May; 146(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 21576612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assessment in pancreatic surgery: what might tomorrow require?
    Kalish BT; Vollmer CM; Kent TS; Nealon WH; Tseng JF; Callery MP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 Jan; 17(1):86-93; discussion p.93. PubMed ID: 23129119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.
    Gooiker GA; van der Geest LG; Wouters MW; Vonk M; Karsten TM; Tollenaar RA; Bonsing BA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):1821-9. PubMed ID: 21544657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.
    van Rijssen LB; Koerkamp BG; Zwart MJ; Bonsing BA; Bosscha K; van Dam RM; van Eijck CH; Gerhards MF; van der Harst E; de Hingh IH; de Jong KP; Kazemier G; Klaase J; van Laarhoven CJ; Molenaar IQ; Patijn GA; Rupert CG; van Santvoort HC; Scheepers JJ; van der Schelling GP; Busch OR; Besselink MG;
    HPB (Oxford); 2017 Oct; 19(10):919-926. PubMed ID: 28754367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The economics of pancreas surgery.
    Vollmer CM
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Jun; 93(3):711-28. PubMed ID: 23632154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.
    Nathan H; Cameron JL; Choti MA; Schulick RD; Pawlik TM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):528-38. PubMed ID: 19476786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lung cancer resection volume: is procedure volume really an indicator of quality?
    Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 22920524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.
    Polonski A; Izbicki JR; Uzunoglu FG
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Oct; 23(10):2081-2092. PubMed ID: 31037503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.
    Schmidt CM; Turrini O; Parikh P; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Howard TJ; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD
    Arch Surg; 2010 Jul; 145(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 20644125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. DISPACT trial: a randomized controlled trial to compare two different surgical techniques of DIStal PAnCreaTectomy - study rationale and design.
    Diener MK; Knaebel HP; Witte ST; Rossion I; Kieser M; Buchler MW; Seiler CM;
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):534-45. PubMed ID: 18827046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The centralisation of highly complex operations].
    Gouma DJ; Laméris HJ; Rauws EA; Busch OR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(32):A4887. PubMed ID: 22871252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Volume-outcome in cancer surgery: why has the data not affected policy change?
    Evans DB; Tsai S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4056-8. PubMed ID: 25239003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A qualitative assessment of a provincial quality improvement strategy for pancreatic cancer surgery.
    Wright FC; Fitch M; Coates AJ; Simunovic M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):629-35. PubMed ID: 20878248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical options in the management of pancreatic cancer.
    Hackert T; Büchler MW; Werner J
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Oct; 64(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 19859037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?
    Amano H; Miura F; Toyota N; Wada K; Katoh K; Hayano K; Kadowaki S; Shibuya M; Maeno S; Eguchi T; Takada T; Asano T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(6):850-7. PubMed ID: 19844653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.