These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23632399)
1. A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers. Johnson CA; Sherman K; Doyle C; Wall M J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 23632399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing. Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B; Heijl A Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm. Newkirk MR; Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4632-7. PubMed ID: 17003461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin? Conway ML; Hosking SL; Zhu H; Cubbidge RP BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 14():166. PubMed ID: 25539569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of catch trial methods used in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients. Wall M; Doyle CK; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Johnson CA J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19092457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma]. Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma. Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster. Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of eye testing order on automated perimetry results using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard 24-2. Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Mora R; Liebmann JM; Ritch R Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):781-4. PubMed ID: 16769830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer. Hirasawa K; Shoji N Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields. Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR; Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]