BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23632673)

  • 1. Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2009.
    Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin L; Petursson G; Lygre S; Ellison P; Hallan G; Furnes O
    Bone Joint J; 2013 May; 95-B(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 23632673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.
    Øhrn FD; Gøthesen Ø; Låstad Lygre SH; Peng Y; Lian ØB; Lewis PL; Furnes O; Röhrl SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1207-1218. PubMed ID: 31977446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Gothesen O; Lygre SHL; Lorimer M; Graves S; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):649-656. PubMed ID: 28929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better survival of hybrid total knee arthroplasty compared to cemented arthroplasty.
    Petursson G; Fenstad AM; Havelin LI; Gøthesen Ø; Lygre SH; Röhrl SM; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 26179889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing.
    Lygre SH; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Vollset SE; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Jun; 82(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 21619502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of survival rate and risk of revision for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Lacko M; Schreierová D
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2019 Aug; 30(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 31291852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival of the low contact stress rotating platform total knee replacement is influenced by age: 1058 implants with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Makaram N; Clement ND; Hoo T; Nutton R; Burnett R
    Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 30232026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Ake CF; Wang C; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twelve-Year Outcomes of an Oxinium Total Knee Replacement Compared with the Same Cobalt-Chromium Design: An Analysis of 17,577 Prostheses from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Vertullo CJ; Lewis PL; Graves S; Kelly L; Lorimer M; Myers P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 28196029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major Aseptic Revision Following Total Knee Replacement: A Study of 478,081 Total Knee Replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Jorgensen NB; McAuliffe M; Orschulok T; Lorimer MF; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 30801369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early failures among 7,174 primary total knee replacements: a follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2000.
    Furnes O; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Apr; 73(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12079006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.
    Puijk R; Sierevelt IN; Pijls BGCW; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Nolte PA
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Dec; 94():600-606. PubMed ID: 38093649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.
    Furnes O; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 89(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17332100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.
    Namba R; Graves S; Robertsson O; Furnes O; Stea S; Puig-Verdié L; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25520419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased risk of revision for high flexion total knee replacement with thicker tibial liners.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Cafri G
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Feb; 96-B(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 24493187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.
    Abdel MP; Ledford CK; Kobic A; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD
    Bone Joint J; 2017 May; 99-B(5):647-652. PubMed ID: 28455474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population.
    Castagnini F; Sudanese A; Bordini B; Tassinari E; Stea S; Toni A
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3368-3372. PubMed ID: 28655567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Schrama JC; Espehaug B; Hallan G; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Fevang BT
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2010 Apr; 62(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20391501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.
    Comfort T; Baste V; Froufe MA; Namba R; Bordini B; Robertsson O; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A; Graves S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25520421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prostheses.
    Graves S; Sedrakyan A; Baste V; Gioe TJ; Namba R; Martínez Cruz O; Stea S; Paxton E; Banerjee S; Isaacs AJ; Robertsson O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25520420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.