These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Outcome of 132 operations in 97 patients with chordomas of the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine. Choi D; Melcher R; Harms J; Crockard A Neurosurgery; 2010 Jan; 66(1):59-65; discussion 65. PubMed ID: 20023538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Seker A; Inoue K; Osawa S; Akakin A; Kilic T; Rhoton AL World Neurosurg; 2010 Dec; 74(6):583-602. PubMed ID: 21492625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope. Pillai P; Baig MN; Karas CS; Ammirati M Neurosurgery; 2009 May; 64(5 Suppl 2):437-42; discussion 442-4. PubMed ID: 19404122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: surgical strategies and results. Perrini P; Benedetto N; Guidi E; Di Lorenzo N Neurosurgery; 2009 May; 64(5 Suppl 2):331-42; discussion 342. PubMed ID: 19287323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Baird CJ; Conway JE; Sciubba DM; Prevedello DM; Quiñones-Hinojosa A; Kassam AB Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):158-63; discussion 63-4. PubMed ID: 19934990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of cervical spine position on the three anterior endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction: an imaging study. Lin ZK; Chi YL; Wang XY; Yu Q; Fang BD; Wu LJ Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24144692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transoral versus extraoral reduction of mandible fractures: a comparison of complication rates and other factors. Toma VS; Mathog RH; Toma RS; Meleca RJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 12601317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: does the transbuccal technique produce fewer complications after treatment than the transoral technique? Wan K; Williamson RA; Gebauer D; Hird K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2620-8. PubMed ID: 22959879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The rise and fall of the craniocervical junction relative to the hard palate: a lifetime story. Mallory GW; Arutyunyan G; Murphy ME; Van Abel KM; Francois E; Wetjen NM; Fogelson JL; O'Brien EK; Clarke MJ; Eckel LJ; Van Gompel JJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 26654341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic endonasal transclival transodontoid approach for ventral decompression of the craniovertebral junction: operative technique and nuances. Liu JK; Patel J; Goldstein IM; Eloy JA Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Apr; 38(4):E17. PubMed ID: 25828493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation for transoral approaches to upper cervical pathology. Dhaliwal PP; Hurlbert RJ; Sutherland GS World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):164-9. PubMed ID: 22120262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior video-assisted approach to the craniovertebral junction: transnasal or transoral? A cadaver study. Visocchi M; La Rocca G; Della Pepa GM; Stigliano E; Costantini A; Di Nardo F; Maira G Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Feb; 156(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 24158245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]