These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2363285)
1. Validity in field research. Brink PJ West J Nurs Res; 1990 Jun; 12(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 2363285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of qualitative research. Clarke L Nurs Stand; 2004 Sep 8-14; 18(52):41-4. PubMed ID: 15473208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating bias in validity studies of developmental/behavioral screening tests. Camp BW J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2007 Jun; 28(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 17565292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finding and evaluating potential research instruments. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 14692363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy. Hartling L; Bond K; Santaguida PL; Viswanathan M; Dryden DM J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 21531537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating qualitative and quantitative components in evaluation of case management. Willenbring ML NIDA Res Monogr; 1992; 127():223-50. PubMed ID: 1435997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of isolated subtalar range of motion: a cadaver study. Taylor KF; Bojescul JA; Howard RS; Mizel MS; McHale KA Foot Ankle Int; 2001 May; 22(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 11428763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a quality-assessment tool for experimental bruxism studies: reliability and validity. Dawson A; Raphael KG; Glaros A; Axelsson S; Arima T; Ernberg M; Farella M; Lobbezoo F; Manfredini D; Michelotti A; Svensson P; List T J Orofac Pain; 2013; 27(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 23630683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability. Kadir MM; Qureshi AF J Pak Med Assoc; 1994 Jun; 44(6):155-7. PubMed ID: 8089912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of measurement error in the study of sexually transmitted infections. Myer L; Morroni C; Link BG Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Aug; 80(4):318-23, 328. PubMed ID: 15295134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Six red flags for suspect work. Begley CG Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):433-4. PubMed ID: 23698428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Minimum follow-up": a potentially misleading methodological design in survival studies. Oliveira AM; Pankratz VS Hum Pathol; 2006 Jun; 37(6):774-6. PubMed ID: 16733223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability of three techniques for measuring foot position. Weiner-Ogilvie S; Rome K J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1998 Aug; 88(8):381-6. PubMed ID: 9735624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias in plain film reading performance studies. Brealey S; Scally AJ Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):307-16. PubMed ID: 11387147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of interobserver reliability of neurophysical signs in head-injured patients. Dijkers M Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Apr; 71(2):124. PubMed ID: 1558734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic problems and evaluation of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus]. Robak E; Kwiecień A; Sysa-Jedrzejowska A Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 16334536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How to plan a controlled clinical trial?]. Benderly M; Chodick G; Lerman Y Harefuah; 2009 Dec; 148(12):846-9. PubMed ID: 20088440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]